Subject:
|
Re: Voting Comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 May 1999 06:43:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
676 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 May 1999 03:05:08 GMT, "John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@msn.com>
wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Terry Keller writes:
> > OK, LDraw elitists,
> >
> > The voting page is up:
> > http://hugin.ldraw.org/JJ_Memorial/voting/datvote
>
>
> It took me a while, but here are my comments on the current batch of voting
> parts. Since others have looked closely at the patterned baseplates, I
> ignored those.
>
> 2851: This may be getting a bit picky for this part, but where the peg holes
> meet the rounded edge, this surface is modeled as flat, rather than rounded.
> As a result, the 1-4cyli.dats do not match up to the 4-4cyli.dats. This is
> mostly noticable in ldlite with shading on.
>
> 2854: There are little gaps on either side of the "canyon" where the axlehole
> is open on its side. I think in the following lines, 3 should be replaced
> with 4.
> 4 16 -1 -1 -10 -3 -1 -10 -3 -1 0 -1 -1 0
> 4 16 -1 1 -10 -3 1 -10 -3 1 0 -1 1 0
> 4 16 1 -1 10 3 -1 10 3 -1 0 1 -1 0
> 4 16 1 1 10 3 1 10 3 1 0 1 1 0
>
> 290: The optional lines got changed from "5 24 ..." to "4 24 ..." creating
> some interesting striations on the vertical tube. This probably happened
> during in inline operation. (Is this bug still in LDAO?)
>
> 30093: Fun piece! I think edge lines are missing where the outer stems
> connect to the inner stems.
>
> Patterned minifig heads: just a suggestion. I think using 1-8cyli.dat for
> the non-patterned "cheeks" would improve the look of these parts in POV-Ray
> quite a bit. I don't know if the back of the head uses cyli.dats, but it
> should as well.
>
> 9326p19: another suggestion. Chris, if you add edge-line drawing of the
> insignia in black before you draw the quads for the stripes, the insignia will
> show up better at lower magnifications.
Good observations, all.
> x733: does this part really have no studs underneath?
Ah ha! A question I can answer! I asked Tore the same question, and he
assured me the part is indeed studless. As shown.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Voting Comments [DAT]
|
| (...) It took me a while, but here are my comments on the current batch of voting parts. Since others have looked closely at the patterned baseplates, I ignored those. 2851: This may be getting a bit picky for this part, but where the peg holes meet (...) (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
