Subject:
|
Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 May 2003 15:40:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
755 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Jason S. Mantor writes:
> > I just did a double take : ) YEA, vertex lists !
> > I was working up to proposing just this sort of addition to the
> > standard. Since these already exist can they be grandfathered into the
> > 1.0 document that Orion has prepared ?
> >
> > PS. I was so annoyed by not being able to use vertex lists that I had
> > "back burned" the LDRAW parts I was working on. Suddenly I'm inspired
> > again !
>
> Uh, you might want to recheck that enthusiasm. Right now, AFAIK (and I
> haven't double-checked, so you might want to try it), *only* LDLite will
> render all of the LDLite meta-statements. They definitely are not allowable
> in parts submitted for inclusion in the ldraw.org library.
>
> Sorry if I mislead you.
Sorry, one more addition:
You can use LDAO to translate any LDL[1] file to straight LDR[2]. So
create your parts in the vertex-list-friendly style, then convert them
for the rest of the world. :)
Steve
1) LDraw files with LDLite language extensions
2) LDraw file format
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Crazy, OK Heretical Idea ...
|
| (...) Uh, you might want to recheck that enthusiasm. Right now, AFAIK (and I haven't double-checked, so you might want to try it), *only* LDLite will render all of the LDLite meta-statements. They definitely are not allowable in parts submitted for (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
