To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 1118
1117  |  1119
Subject: 
Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad
Date: 
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:40:25 GMT
Viewed: 
73 times
  
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:08:23 GMT, "Matthew Bates"
<train_depot@yahoo.com> wrote:

... I haven't
played with LDraw much because the biggest thing that put me off is the parts
database, half the models I look at seem to have missing parts and when I want
to draw something, many of the parts don't seem to be available. Now, of
course I could be doing something wrong, but that's the point - the user
shouldn't have to mess about looking for parts.

An online database isn't going to completely address your two issues --
missing parts and parts which haven't been created.

Typically, parts will be missing from a model either because (a) the
parts aren't made yet (and it's actually problem #2) or the part was
renumbered after the model was created, and it wasn't possible to leave
a forwarding reference in the parts database (in this case, there should
be a bogus part in the model, using the same number).

An online database will let the viewer off the hook, as far as keeping
their own installation of LDraw up-to-date.

[1] Of course, it doesn't require Java to support an online database, but it
probably makes it a bit easier.

Very true.  Should I add downloading/installing parts updates to LDAO?

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
 
(...) What happens when a part is move, with a moved_to file, and a model is loaded and edited? Does the editor save the _new_ part number, or the old? If you have it automatically saving the _new_ part number, you could make a ~moved_to file for (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
 
(...) standard (...) To me, that would be the primary advantage of a Java version[1], I haven't played with LDraw much because the biggest thing that put me off is the parts database, half the models I look at seem to have missing parts and when I (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)

51 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR