To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.adventurersOpen lugnet.adventurers in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Adventurers / 93
92  |  94
Subject: 
Re: Arctic Adventurers
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.adventurers
Date: 
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 16:51:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1306 times
  
In lugnet.adventurers, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
Mark Lindsey:
Instead of a small temple how about a friggin' huge one!

Wouldn't make sense from a commercial point of view. The
part count (price) of a set should be comparable to the
"play value" of the set.

What do you mean by the above statement?  How do you determine the play value
of any set?  I guess I am not understanding what you mean, please explain.

I think the best opposition would be to have a set of
"pirates" from the early 1900s out on the open seas
looking for treasures lost years ago by real pirates.
They are opportunistic enough however to take any ancient
treasures Johnny Thunder might find.

This sounds good. How are they equipped? Small freighter
with a hydroplane on the deck?

I have the crew from the ship the Dirty Whore, from the movie Cabin Boy in
mind.  You know the one starring Chris Elliot.  Funny, surreal movie that
contains a ship full of dirty, seedy mariners at odds with a smarmy, effete
prep school boy who is unwittingly a passenger on the ship.  If you have not
seen the movie you should.  Any how the freighter with a hydroplane and maybe
even a dive suit or two would be their mode of transportation.  Their base
could be an atoll or dead volcano crater out at sea.


Mark L



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Arctic Adventurers
 
Mark Lindsey: (...) That large sets apparently have to do lots of things to make people (not us) consider them worth the price. (...) It's hard (if not impossible). LEGO's current definition seems to be related to how many traps, cars, planes, and (...) (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Arctic Adventurers
 
Mark Lindsey: (...) Thanks. (...) Wouldn't make sense from a commercial point of view. The part count (price) of a set should be comparable to the "play value" of the set. (...) This sounds good. How are they equipped? Small freighter with a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)

30 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR