Subject:
|
Re: Arctic Adventurers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.adventurers
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 14:40:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7555 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Lindsey:
> Those are fantastic ideas!
Thanks.
> Instead of a small temple how about a friggin' huge one!
Wouldn't make sense from a commercial point of view. The
part count (price) of a set should be comparable to the
"play value" of the set.
> I think the best opposition would be to have a set of
> "pirates" from the early 1900s out on the open seas
> looking for treasures lost years ago by real pirates.
> They are opportunistic enough however to take any ancient
> treasures Johnny Thunder might find.
This sounds good. How are they equipped? Small freighter
with a hydroplane on the deck?
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Arctic Adventurers
|
| (...) What do you mean by the above statement? How do you determine the play value of any set? I guess I am not understanding what you mean, please explain. (...) I have the crew from the ship the Dirty Whore, from the movie Cabin Boy in mind. You (...) (27 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Arctic Adventurers
|
| (...) OK I won't. (...) No problem. (...) Those are fantastic ideas! Instead of a small temple how about a friggin' huge one! I want at least 600 pieces in it. I also want statues. Tons of statues of little minifig marble people like in your link. I (...) (27 years ago, 10-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
