Subject:
|
Re: Greatest Adventurer Movies
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.adventurers
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:50:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2428 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, Mark Lindsey writes:
> Hi fellow adventurers,
> While I agree with Bruce that the Quartermain movies stink they still must
> be considered because the fit the genre perfectly. I guess the best that
> could be said of them is that they are an extremely impoverished man's version
> of the Indiana Jones films. And I mean that the man must be lying in a ditch,
> covered in leperous sores, with a starving distended belly and no clothing!
> Poor, poor man's version.
Oh, alright. With your caveat, of course. :-)
> By the way Bruce let us in on where that list of the worst films is. I'd
> like to see how many of my favorites are on it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark L
Oh, dang. I printed it out and it is being passed around at work. I think you
can find it at www.thestinkers.com. It was frightening how many on the list I
have seen, but also reassuring that the ones I have been staying away from I
was right about. They are preparing a 2nd 100 list of bad films. I wanna
nominate "The English Patient"! Snnnnnnnnoooooorrrrrreeeeee!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Greatest Adventurer Movies
|
| (...) City (...) Hi fellow adventurers, While I agree with Bruce that the Quartermain movies stink they still must be considered because the fit the genre perfectly. I guess the best that could be said of them is that they are an extremely (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
