| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
<snip>
> > of a similar incorrect decisions in the future.
>
> Assuming it was an incorrect decision, that is.
>
> I'm not aware of any reviewing decisions (decisions, not implementations of
> them, we have already acknowledged some issues with one specific one) that have
> been incorrect, since I started being involved in making them. Are you?
<snip>
We haven't really seen 'em, so how can we tell if they're incorrect?
It's a matter of trust. Well, a prime minister of some country got on the telly
last night and talked about that. Trust is earned by the inch and lost by the
yard. Again, right or wrong, the perception is that the admin team is
'untrustworthy', even by some members of the admin team. So where does that get
the general LUGNET populace?
Dave K
-who woudn't trust Paul Martin right now with running the local Quik-E mart,
yet alone a country
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
