| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > > This is an important point that bears repeating:
> > >
> > > " endless debate (about specific reviewing actions) has proven (in many many
> > > other places, not just here) not to be useful "
> > >
> > > (YCLIU)
> >
> > Please point me to an endless debate.
>
> Sorry, that was rhetoric. LUGNET is not infinite so there never has been an
> "endless" one. But there have been lots of interminable ones, don't you agree?
PS, that's just the sort of "picking at every word" (questioning "endless" when
you know what was meant) that deters participation.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
45 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
