To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1169
1168  |  1170
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet clone handling? (was: Re: LEGO clone auction)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:44:53 GMT
Viewed: 
1303 times
  
Thomas Main wrote:
I've noticed this too.  I like to think the aversion comes from
legitimate concerns about quality - but modern MegaBloks are of a very
high quality.  I have a few Tyco bricks that I think are on par with
Lego bricks with regard to their quality so it would be even harder to
make the quality argument in that case.

See my review of Mega Bloks in lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, they are
definitely of lower quality than Lego. I came in somewhat skeptical off
the aversion to MB. Now I'm almost a believer (in Lego purity). The
Creature Seekers Naval Command was somewhat frustrating to build because
things didn't lock together very well.

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet clone handling? (was: Re: LEGO clone auction)
 
(...) Hmm...sounds like a condition that aging, has-been rockers have....have you seen some of the VH1 "Where Are They Now?" episodes? (...) I've noticed this too. I like to think the aversion comes from legitimate concerns about quality - but (...) (26 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

35 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR