To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1169
1168  |  1170
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet clone handling? (was: Re: LEGO clone auction)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:44:53 GMT
Viewed: 
5794 times
  
Thomas Main wrote:
> I've noticed this too.  I like to think the aversion comes from
> legitimate concerns about quality - but modern MegaBloks are of a very
> high quality.  I have a few Tyco bricks that I think are on par with
> Lego bricks with regard to their quality so it would be even harder to
> make the quality argument in that case.

See my review of Mega Bloks in lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, they are
definitely of lower quality than Lego. I came in somewhat skeptical off
the aversion to MB. Now I'm almost a believer (in Lego purity). The
Creature Seekers Naval Command was somewhat frustrating to build because
things didn't lock together very well.

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet clone handling? (was: Re: LEGO clone auction)
 
(...) Hmm...sounds like a condition that aging, has-been rockers have....have you seen some of the VH1 "Where Are They Now?" episodes? (...) I've noticed this too. I like to think the aversion comes from legitimate concerns about quality - but (...) (28 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

35 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR