To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1164
1163  |  1165
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet clone handling? (was: Re: LEGO clone auction)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 17:37:14 GMT
Viewed: 
5909 times
  
Oh, btw, I was going to make a point in this debate :) but forgot -

what happens if someone holds either a set or brick auction that
includes clone brands?

--
Thomas Main
main@appstate.edu

Thomas Main wrote:
> 
> John Neal wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > 
> > You are SO right on with that observation Christopher!  But I think that *all*
> > of us feel this way to some extent.  Sure, we joke about it, but seriously:
> > what is it about Lego that is _so_ completely different than any other toy,
> > and I mean _really_ different?
> > I wonder if it is some form of nostalgic narcissism [1].
> > 
> > [1] What the hell *that* is I haven't a clue, but it sounded good and it's
> > alliterative:-)
> 
> Hmm...sounds like a condition that aging, has-been rockers have....have
> you seen some of the VH1 "Where Are They Now?" episodes?
> 
> > -John
> > 
> > > Reflected in some recent and historic posts is a seemingly neurotic
> > > aversion to clone bricks.  What is the origin of this?  I'm not
> > > interested in MegaBlocks because
> > > they feel cheap and sort-of smoosh together instead of snapping together
> > > like Lego, but it seems that for some Lego is the religion competing
> > > against others.  What's the deal?
> 
> I've noticed this too.  I like to think the aversion comes from
> legitimate concerns about quality - but modern MegaBloks are of a very
> high quality.  I have a few Tyco bricks that I think are on par with
> Lego bricks with regard to their quality so it would be even harder to
> make the quality argument in that case.
> 
> It's easy to discriminate against the clones based on set design, I
> think; Lego still has the best designs by a long shot - but that doesn't
> explain the aversion to clones as building material.
> 
> Sometimes I indulge in a fantasy of making my own bricks and starting my
> own clone company or having the members of LUGNET/RTL start such a
> venture.  The problem is that it would be *LEGO* so no matter how good
> the brick quality or how good the designs - nobody would like it :(
> 
> --
> Thomas Main
> main@appstate.edu
> 
> > > --
> > > Sincerely,
> > > 
> > > Christopher L. Weeks
> > > central Missouri, USA



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Lugnet clone handling? (was: Re: LEGO clone auction)
 
(...) Ahh, excellent question. --Todd (28 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet clone handling? (was: Re: LEGO clone auction)
 
(...) Hmm...sounds like a condition that aging, has-been rockers have....have you seen some of the VH1 "Where Are They Now?" episodes? (...) I've noticed this too. I like to think the aversion comes from legitimate concerns about quality - but (...) (28 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

35 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR