Subject:
|
Re: LEGO clone auction
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 03:35:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
882 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Jon Nichol ("Quozl") writes:
> > I'm just wondering which group would be appropiate to auction
> > a LEGO clone. The clones group or the auction group?
>
> I dunno. What do people in the .off-topic.clone-brands group think about
> auctions in that group? (You could ask their opinions.) I don't like the
> idea of including non-LEGO commerce in the .market.* hierarchy, and I'm
> not keen on the idea of a parallel hierarchy for clone brands. If people
> in the .clone-brands group can agree on allowing auctions and the like
> there, I don't suppose I have a problem with that.
I think you're right in not wanting the clone-brands marketplace stuff in
the regular groups. I don't see a problem with allowing marketplace activity
in the single clone-brands group unless the volume gets high (which I doubt
it will). As a willing purchaser (with only a little regret) of clone
brands, I can support your desire to keep Lugnet primarily a Lego resource.
Having a single place for clone-brand activity to occur is a reasonable way
to make a place for information about clone brands to be easily available,
yet not overshadow Lego.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO clone auction
|
| (...) Hmm, this is a good question. Like the rest of the site, the .market.* hierarchy is for LEGO® brand toys. From (URL) ... lugnet.market.auction (group): Auction announcements, updates, listings, and analysis; NOTE: this group is the ONLY group (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
