 | | Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
|
|
This type of speech really necessary? -- Mike Edwards Lugnet Member #151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kanohi-Power - Bionicle Site on the web (URL) shop - Edwards Parts (URL) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) Agreed. (...) After waiting a couple days to see if this post would get a reply, I'm writing to voice my agreement with Larry and my disagreement with how issues like this are handled on LUGNET. In essence, by Suz stating that she doesn't want (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) Well, I believe deprecated does not mean prohibited; it means that it is going to be prohibited in a future version, so you'll have to change it someday. Am I wrong about that? Does CSS offer an equivalent to this? It seems possible to me. I (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
You would be right about using the target= attribute as a backup if I was writing to the Transitional DTDs or against the loose URIs. Deprecated means I can't use the target= attribute in an XML document that validates against the DTDs for HTML 4.01 (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
The target= attribute is deprecated in HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0. If I, for whatever reason of vanity and the like, choose to write an XML document that validates against the strict DTDs, then I cannot use the target= attribute. You are correct that (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) defenitly, my slip, sorry :) (...) hmmm... at least in mozilla, it doesn't create a new window. so it's only used to break out of frames, which is a very good thing for a button to do. (...) :) Dan (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) JavaScript, not Java. A completely separate and unrelated language. Note that target="_top" is for frames, to load the page in the outermost frame (i.e. the whole window). For a new window, the correct value is target="_blank". If you are not (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
(...) but that will only work if the client supports java - if java is unavailable (for whatever reason), the button will act as a normal link. Why not put the target tag as a backup for the java? Dan (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(...) For the record, I am looking for no further answer. The issue is closed as far as I am concerned. (...) I have just realised how much I have enjoyed not noticing you over the past couple of weeks. I am rather disappointed, and I must admit (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
As far as the markup for including the LUGNET buttons and banners on a web page is concerned, the target= attribute of the <a> tag is deprecated in HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0. While I explore how to replace the exact functionality of the target="_top" (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html)
|
| |
| | for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
|
(you didn't say "for the eyes of... ONLY" :-) (...) It's not dead, it's just resting. :-) Calling for a member to be banned is a very serious matter. At least it *ought* to be considered very serious. Unless that call is withdrawn, some answer ought (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
(...) please forward me one of the messages you recieve, with the full headers, and I will try and take care of it. Forward it to dan@peeron.com. Dan (25 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
Hi - is there any administrator of the Mail/News server that can please unsubscribe me from any and all mailing lists. I can't get any responses ever from the server, it thinks I am not subscribed to anything, yet I continually (still) receive (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Happy Birthday Wishes! Dec. 13 - Dec. 19
|
|
Hiya guys! This morning I met someone at school who is, to the day, ten years older than me. (1) Anyway, the whole "Birthday Buddy" issue came back to me (2) and I realized... what would be nicer than a little birthday wish in some corner of the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Funny Time Stamp for Post (was [michlug_ltc] GATS flyer)
|
|
Dan & All, (...) Hey folks, Indiana is on EST for 6 months out of the year, and it is the same time right now, you bigoted Michigan resident! ; ) (...) Nope, it's right. I *think* it might have something to do with replying to an older post perhaps, (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Funny Time Stamp for Post (was [michlug_ltc] GATS flyer)
|
|
(...) time (...) Indiana, but (...) I believe that the date is just whatever Date header his machine inserted in the message (since it's posted via SMTP). So my guess is that Scott's machine has it's date set wrong. Not much we can do on this end... (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Funny Time Stamp for Post (was [michlug_ltc] GATS flyer)
|
|
Um, Scott's posts 2477 and 2478 (in Michlug) both show a Friday the 14th time stamp. And they both have a reply to them on the 13th. I know he's Indiana, but they aren't that far off? Why is this? -Jason (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The Lego Website [was: Re: LEGO... are you out there? Do you care?]
|
|
(...) I'll agree that lego.com isn't terribly interesting. . .the only part I might have been interested in was looking at the Castle stuff, which specifically is not viewable without going through a Flash waste-of-time (which doesn't seem to like (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
(...) I show you subscribed to lugnet.announce, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.lego.announce, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.starwars and lugnet.trains. Are the groups you are trying to unsubscribe included in this list? If so, I'll (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
thanks I tried x-posting after the fact but it said I'd already submitted the topic ! ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> To: <lugnet.general@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.admin.genera...ugnet.com> Sent: Tuesday, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help on Unsubscribing (web site doesn't think I'm subscribed)
|
|
(...) x-posted to admin.general for visibility thanks, James (25 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Admin assistance needed, I think.
|
|
(...) Thanks, James! I was overlooking the obvious...I knew it couldn't be anything difficult. -Dave (25 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) I agree 100%. Scott A (25 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Admin assistance needed, I think.
|
|
(...) Redo your posting setup cookie. Go to (URL) re-enter your information with the correct e-mail address. It will update your posting cookie. :) James I'm not an admin, but I've played one on TV. (25 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Go5DH7.In2@lugnet.com... (...) interface? (...) a (...) I use Outlook Express to read LUGNET as I personally find the web interface painful to use. The verification process is realtively (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Admin assistance needed, I think.
|
|
Hello Admins! I seem to have encountered a small problem with my profile/login. Since the demise of @Home, my email is no longer what is listed at the top of the messages. It should be listed as legomecha@adelphia.net. I've tried logging out and (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Yea, not so bad as trying to pull up the web view of the message to respond, but still a pain. I hope at some point there will be a page accessible as a logged in member which pulls up all the unverified messages and lets you select which ones (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Well I'm using Aol 7 for e-mail(which has bugs). And you can't often click an url in an email, you have to copy and paste it, even though I selected the setting that's supposed to let you just cick email urls. Steve (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) I do post via the web interface but I'm not a 'paid-up' member so I can't sign in. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Wow, that's even harder than it is for me. I have to send the message, wait for the server responce, click the url and hit yes. A grand total of 2 clicks. Definetly not brain surgery, and no, I don't want verification to go away either. (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) I don't know about that Steven, but this one would rather read in a newsreader. Unfortunately, this means that to start a reply on the web requires going through the process of: Press [H] to display the headers (I'm using Forte Agent). (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Because those of us who use newsreaders can sort through and view messages WAY faster than we could with the web interface. Unfortunately, the verification stuff throws a monkeywrench in the gears, so I tend to post less frequently than I did (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Member State
|
|
How does one change the State (and Flag) on one's member page? I figured clicking on it might do the trick, but that just takes you to the local group. I fear I may feel dumb if the answer is easy ... but it's a comfortable feeling for me. -s (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
In lugnet.general, Steven Lane writes: <snip> (...) Unforunatly he hasn't gone away, he still post to R.T.L every once in awhile and makes claims that he will be back to LUGNET. So what can you do, it's a hassle but these kind of jerks make lots of (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) well :-(. (...) if it bothers you that much, why don't you just post via the web interface? no verification there? (...) to (...) I doubt that will happen. Dan (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Yeah but the police don't hassle me for my I.D. EVERY day!! (...) I agree the person(s) was a total jerk. But he's probably gone now anyway. Why not have verification for the month following a strike, then revert to normal. Steve (25 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Police stink. It's not like that many people are being robbed. I agree 100% that it's a pain to have to do the verification, but put that blame where it belongs - on the jerk(s) who were abusing all our trust, instead of with the people who (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
|
(...) Me too! Verification sucks. And just think, I'll have to verify this post as well :-(. It's not even like that many people we're being impersonated. Steve (25 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Images of the new 2K2 Line
|
|
(...) I wouldn't leak information like this on LUGNET. The administrators have explicitly said many times that information like this should not be published on LUGNET. (I would use rec.toys.lego :-) Fredrik (25 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Images of the new 2K2 Line
|
|
Play it like politicians. Put them in a secret place, say a page on your website that doesn't have a direct link to it, then leak the location to the press - Lugnet. Duq Michael Edwards <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Images of the new 2K2 Line
|
|
(...) I wouldn't mind a copy either ... (25 years ago, 7-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Images of the new 2K2 Line
|
|
(...) :) (...) I (...) Well some of the images that i have on Kanohi-Power may have been taken from the dealers catalogue but i am not so sure.. But the rest of this stuff is from the dealers catalogue (the blue brick banner on each row).... If you (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Images of the new 2K2 Line
|
|
(...) Email them to me personally;-) All seriousness aside, you were right by not posting them here on LUGNET. I guess the rest of us will have to wait a few more weeks.... -John (25 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Images of the new 2K2 Line
|
|
This time its not Bionicle.. I have scans of the new Technic 2k2 line which shows a new RC Control Unit for a "Super" Car? not as big as the 8448 or 8880 But i am not sure if i should post them, as with past problems with Dealer Catalogue images... (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Unexpected email
|
|
(...) !? (...) [snip] (...) what happened is that two people who are subscribed to the group you wrote to have bad autoresponders set up - I say bad, because a good autoresponder knows not to reply to list/bulk email. not much we can do from our (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Unexpected email
|
|
I posted to robotics (message 16674): reply to rcx 2.0 without power plug !? and I got two emails: One from: Georg Wolf georg.wolf@eurpoe.lego.com Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: rcx 2.0 without power plug !? Text: Dear Sender, I am out of the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Attributes of the IMG tag used in displaying the LUGNET logo
|
|
With respect to the LUGNET buttons available at (URL) I have discovered that Netscape 6 does not display the text associated with the alt= attribute but will display (in the manner that other browsers show the alt= text) the string associated with (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Clarification wanted re: sale posts in theme groups
|
|
Apologies to the horse for continuing to beat it, but I'd really like to see something definitive about this. Some say it's OK, some say it's not OK, but the rules allow it, some don't seem to care what anyone says. I've recently noticed a few of (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion: focus
|
|
(...) A nice suggestion, and it works well (for example) in Google's entry page (URL) but it wouldn't be a good default here, as it would disable scrolling with the up and down arrow keys when you enter a page, and that would really suck. --Todd (25 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Suggestion: focus
|
|
Could you please add auto-focus to the search fields at the top of most of pages? It is very convenient and I have shown an example of the code required below. Thanks, Dwayne ---...--- <html><head><script> <!-- function sf(){document.f.q.focus();} (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Search by name (yet another request)
|
|
(...) I agree. I think there is scope to overhaul the interface with the search engine here to make it a good deal user friendlier. Something in the format of the google "advanced" search would be good: (URL) like you say, it is a matter of (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Joining LUGNET
|
|
(...) Just be patient, things will happen. When I became a member last July, it took a full month between the time I applied and the time my name appeared on the members list. You have to realize that the LUGNET Admins are working adults with full (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.us.texlug, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Joining LUGNET
|
|
(...) Have you paid the memmbership fee? ShawnG (25 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.us.texlug, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator database?
|
|
Ooops. Just noticed .curators - FUT there. (...) nice (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Curator database?
|
|
Are the current curators stored in a (the) database? If so, it'd be really nice to generate a footer for the main page of those with curators (similar to what Lar has at the bottom of .trains) with the name & contact of the curator(s). Also maybe a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
I agree with Scott. Don't 'mumble', just miss it out, it looks silly. David (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Search by name (yet another request)
|
|
(...) I think that's a great idea! When I was trying to catch up on those debates, I found it really hard to find information on the posters and the subjects, using the main search directory. Most of the time it came up to irrevelent information. (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Search by name (yet another request)
|
|
Hey Steve and/or Dan and/or Jenn! I know I know, priorities and all that, but I will still drop a small request. I haven't requested anything for a loooong time, so I'll give it a shot. Can we please have an advanced search capability to search by (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: testing
|
|
in article GnKy22.HHz@lugnet.com, Jason Spears at spearjr@hotmail.com wrote on 11/29/01 2:54 PM: (...) Well, no, not that big a deal. I sort of had the idea there were a couple minifig stickers, or something, with the LUGNET logo on them. Then (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: testing
|
|
(...) I'm not losing sleep over it anything. I just thought at one point I would be a Card Carrying LUGNET Member. :) NO biggie either way, I guess. -Jason +---...---+ Jason Spears (URL) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Slowness
|
|
(...) on (...) has (...) guys, this doesn't belong in .admin.general, does it? FUT o-t.debate (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Slowness
|
|
in article GnK2wE.8uL@lugnet.com, Scott A at eh105jb@mx1.pair.com wrote on 11/29/01 3:41 AM: (...) If you had any sense you'd be embarrassed to see them at all. Ever. (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Slowness
|
|
(...) Indeed. It is a little embarrassing to see those posts after the dust has settled... Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) Does nobody understand irony around here... Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) I go away for the holiday and come back to find this? I took a brief look at a small sample of the threads that led up to this posting and I can say that I'm a shocked and saddened. All I can say is that I hope that the parties involved can (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: testing
|
|
(...) sent (...) I never received mine from Aug 2000, but I'm not particularly fussed. ROSCO (25 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: testing
|
|
in article GnJ0vK.FI9@lugnet.com, Jason Spears at spearjr@hotmail.com wrote on 11/28/01 1:59 PM: (...) I never got one, either. I think mebbe this stopped when Todd left... Rob (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Slowness
|
|
(...) Looks like that "good taste" module in the email gateway is working great guys! Sorta like those logon screens that get slower & slower the more times you get the password wrong....8?) ROSCO (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Daniel Jassim writes: How about a new group? lugnet.off-topic.Larry&Scott I don't mind the nitpicking between the two, so long as I don't have to deal with it regularly. They are the main reason I stay out of .Debate. How (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: testing
|
|
(...) Welcome! (...) I seem to recall it taking about a week. But this was over a year ago now. Speaking of which I still haven't recieved my membership package, so I can assume that will never come. Suz, is it fair to say that these won't be sent (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
in article GnI6H6.5Mo@lugnet.com, Scott A at eh105jb@mx1.pair.com wrote on 11/28/01 3:03 AM: (...) Yes, we're all VERY immature. You should teach us all a lesson, and give us the silent treatment...no posting to ANY of us, for...oh...five years. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
T-Bird, I came across this post kind of accidentally. I wasn't going to reply but then I figured I should publicly voice my support for what you said. You know, I made the foolish mistake of getting into these fruitless debates. LUGNET is supposed (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Slowness
|
|
I authorised these on Friday (via e-mail) but they took until last night to appear: (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 8:04 PM) (URL) (mail at November 23, 2001 7:53 PM) Scott A (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) I've had enough of this petty name-calling, I wish you would all grow up :) Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: but it (...) I'll skip it and wait for the movie. I wonder who will be cast as the lead characters? (Maybe they will choose animals? Silly me, the SPCA would have none of that!) -John FUT OT.fun (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) *Ouch* I just went through the most horrible part of LUGNET. I missed this whole part because of the nice filters on news.lugnet.com I stand corrected and will try to read everything before I answer to a post. The only reason I came across (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) All too obvious. I was actually reading admin.general to catch up on general administration items that happend over the Thanksgiving holiday, but it feels more like I'm reading a biography of an elementary school hall monitor.... -Duane (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) Mark - read lugnet.admin.general around this post. It should be obvious. Jason J Railton (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Grow up.
|
|
(...) First of all: Suz, I respect you and your role as LUGNET Admin. But I have to ask: what do you mean with this? I mean, we all play with LEGO, so growing up is part of the not-done thingy. Seriuosly though: what do you mean? Mark de Kock (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
I'm not going to bicker with you in the group. I'll discuss facts. But there is nothing to be gained by addressing the tosh below in this group. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Calling for banishment?
|
|
I'm not going to bicker with you in the group. I'll discuss facts. But there is nothing to be gained by addressing the garbage below. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
in article GnEx5o.DL7@lugnet.com, Scott A at eh105jb@mx1.pair.com wrote on 11/26/01 8:49 AM: (...) Yes. If they are spurious, they will speak for themselves. If you REALLY feel you have been harmed, then get a lawyer and sue for slander, or libel, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
in article GnFpB6.6pB@lugnet.com, Larry Pieniazek at lpieniazek@mercator.com wrote on 11/26/01 6:57 PM: (...) Thus spake the Marvel comics villain. (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GnFpB6.6pB@lugnet.com... (...) care, (...) not (...) Well, at least 17 people have approved. As for the rest of the people here? We will never know. Note, there's no longer a way of (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever
|
|
Larry: I think that you are seeing your own role in this in too positive a light, I even perceive that you are trying to dress up your contest with Scott as somehow heroic on behalf of the greater community on your part. It just ain't so -- at least (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Whatever
|
|
(...) Yes, but do they care enough to do what needs to be done? And if they care, is that thing a doable thing just because they care? I don't think so. Any call for a penalty for anyone is just whistling in the wind because it's not the community (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GnEx5o.DL7@lugnet.com... (...) I had already read that thread, and I've developed the opinion that both of you were at fault. In the spirit of letting -that- debate die, I won't elaborate (...) (25 years ago, 27-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: edventures spam
|
|
(...) Lugnet isn't spam free, although I *think* it's set up to discourage robots and other automated creepy crawlies. Anyone harvesting from Lugnet would have to at least subscribe, and grab the e-mail addys from message headers. This takes out a (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: edventures spam
|
|
(...) Thanks Dan and Jenn, No big deal overall (to me at least), although I must have dreamed that LUGNET was spam free. -chris (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Grow up.
|
|
Look: I don't care what your opinions are and I'm not going to baby-sit. So just knock it off, and/or go away. You all know who you are. Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
(...) Check the posting times. Do you seriously think I should let Larry level all sort of spurious allegations against me? Really? (...) I have not read them all. But I have not been the only culprit here. Read the thread which started this up to (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | The Scott and Larry Show: Call for a Series Finale
|
|
Admins, please, this has to stop. Despite the expressions of disgust over Scott and Larry's mudslinging from many Lugnetters, they continue it with no regard. Just today Scott posts 9 more responses to Larry's posts, all in a short period of time. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: edventures spam
|
|
(...) the inv@peeron.com addy also doesn't post (afaik) - it was only mentioned *in* posts.. I spamcopped the edventures' mail each week i got them.. I think they stopped coming, but I don't know if it was because of the spamcopping or if i finally (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: edventures spam
|
|
(...) Both me and Jennifer recieved such spam as well, including to inv@peeron.com, which isn't subscribe to anything, of course. Unfortunatly, there's nothing stopping anyone from harvesting LUGNET for addresses - no protection, at least yet. Dan (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | edventures spam
|
|
Did anyone else receive spam from a company called edventures.com? I've been getting stuff for weeks until I unsubscribed a few days ago. It appeared in all my accounts that are linked to lugnet somehow and didn't appear in my non lugnet accounts. I (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
(...) How about "Neat images of the moment"? Inside jokes are cute but if they're too obtuse and hide prime content (as opposed to extras for those "in the know"), then I wonder if they are an obstruction. Just a thought (from another curator who is (...) (25 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology.
|
|
(...) I refuse to support the banning of one member of Lugnet over a dispute with another member of Lugnet unless both parties are banned together. So I think you should be more careful of the things you are seeking to achieve because you will end (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Question about Location on profile
|
|
Not sure if this is the right place for this question, but here goes: I have recently moved from Illinois to Arizona, how can I get my state location on my profile changed to reflect this? I tried editing my profile, but it still says I am in (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Calling for banishment?
|
|
I'm stuck here, because I'm more honest than most. Were the shoe on the other foot, Scott would have no qualms about saying he'd never do it again, even if in his heart of hearts he knew he might. Yes I violated Scott's privacy a teeny teeny bit. I (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology.
|
|
Sorry. I had not noticed you had re-set the FUT. Scott A (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
