 | | Re: Apology.
|
|
(...) Dave sums it up: (URL) did what he did *knowing* it breaks the ToU here. He did what he did *knowing* it was a violation of my privacy rights. He did what he did in his usual belligerent manner: ==+== See, I march to my own metronome, and the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology.
|
|
My My, someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.... I normally stay out of debate, I don't need anymore crap in my life, though you brought this into the public forum where I do read, and of course, I had to go back and look at the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology.
|
|
(...) ... and he his doing do whilst casting insults, untruths and *knowing* it breaks the ToU here: ==+== See, I march to my own metronome, and the violation of his privacy rights when weighed against the harm he causes here on a daily basis with (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology.
|
|
(...) Something needs to be done. All of our e-mails are displayed here based on trust. If members here feel they have the right to abuse that trust, what sort of place will this become? This person has taken my details from this forum, and used (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: membership packet
|
|
(...) I'm member number 447. I signed up in August of 2000, If I recall. Still haven't gotten my packet yet. Don't hold your breath. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: membership packet
|
|
(...) Last I've heard, they are still being sent, *but* at a very big delay. I think the past few hundred members have not received their packets yet. Priorities, priorities... HTH, -Shiri (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | membership packet
|
|
I received this in my membership activation email back in July: Your LUGNET Member Packet is queued up for printing and postage and should arrive to you within a few weeks. This will contain an official LUGNET Membership card bearing your name and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Why can't I change my email?!?
|
|
I am being forced to change my email address by my ISP but LUGNET will not let me, a member, change the email address that I post with. At this point I am forced to signout and then authenticate any messages I want to post via the web interface (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
(...) [snipped clarification, thanks!] (...) I agree, and you've already said it's not practical for you, hopefully someone else less familiar with FTX may find it practical, viable, and even useful! ROSCO (25 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
Larry, You are mind bogglingly mistaken at a number of levels, but like I said yesterday (when most your nation was spending time with their families, and you were causing a nuisance here), I'm not going to squabble with you on this. I have made my (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
(...) Yes, and thanks for the suggestion. I've tried it and I find it to be error prone compared to edit in place. (...) (as an aside, to this architect if it's not practical it's not viable) (...) I don't see *you* stirring up trouble. My (not (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
(...) group's (...) I (...) Well, although I agree (as I said above) that it's probably not worth the effort, I'd disagreee with the rest. I've re-organised my personal LUGNET site a couple of times now, and it's real easy to copy pages - just go (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
(...) Too much cut and paste, too likely to introduce errors, too labor intensive and no real benefit. It's just *not like* HTML where you upload the exact page you want after checking it out locally. This is particularly true for the front page of (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-member FTX pages
|
|
(...) Cool. :) (...) Ya. I wasn't thinking links so much (except in the case of moving something like Frank's list(s), which are culled from Lugnet postings) as I was thinking of other resources that would be good to have commonly sourced, for (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-member FTX pages
|
|
(...) Curate is somthing a little different... it is in the Church of England anyway(?) What about "curate's egg", is that a Britishism? Scott A (FUT who knows where?) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-member FTX pages
|
|
(...) I think it *must* be a good idea because I think it already works that way. When I went to the train URL you gave I got a "start this page" FTX button, but when I went to the castle URL you gave I got nothing, just the "this isn't a page" (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Curator for lugnet.trains
|
|
(...) Note this request... (...) When I got it, there was no link there. I added the (Link?) so that if people have the link they would send it to me. Like I said, it's going to get waxed if I don't get a link for it soon. (...) This is a bit of an (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where'd it go?
|
|
(...) Now we only have 24 hour data... Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Non-member FTX pages
|
|
Here's a suggestion; I don't know how feasable it is: Allow group curators to make FTX pages hosted on Lugnet that aren't necessarily tied to their membership (if they're members), limited to their area of curatorship(1). (ex if Larry went to (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
(...) homepage? (...) I can answer that. When members are logged in through the web interface, they can "rate" posts as they read them. The rating is combined to create a score, and the spotlight is generated from that score. It's completely (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
hey, suz.. i was wondering how exactly it worked that someone gets on the spotlight list, and more specifically on the news list on the lugnet homepage? is this your choice or by some weird cpu thing? peace -lenny (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
(...) well, if NO ONE is repling to your post, you begin to look for some other type of feedback... hit rates can serve that purpose. -lenny (25 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Getting my password emailed to me
|
|
I swear I knew my password was but it doesn't work. Who do I talk to to get it? (25 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where'd it go?
|
|
(...) There is a problem with the traffic page right now: (URL) are data for the past hour & the past 7 days... but not the past 24 hours. Scott A (25 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Where'd it go?
|
|
Anything we should know about the outage other than "it's back now"? (25 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
|
OK, thanks for unsubscribing me Dan, and sorry for all the bounced messages guys. I got made redundant from UBIStudios about three weeks and didn't have time to unsubscribe from the mailing list (I've only just got internet access again) I'm really (...) (25 years ago, 15-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
|
I just removed the subscriptions of 'steveb@ubistudios.co.uk'. Please allow for a few hours for all messages already in transit to bounce, but after that, let me know if anyone gets any more bounces from that address. Thanks, Dan (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
|
(...) <snipped> I'm getting these from .pirates. I've never, ever, EVER gotten any of these before, and I post rather extensively and exclusively from the Web interface. They're incredibly annoying, even worse than authentication. Who is (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Undeliverable Mail goes to news poster?
|
|
I keep getting these also. Has this person been unsubscribed from all Lugnet groups yet? Please do us a favor and unsubscribe this person so we don't get indirectly spammed. Thanks Frank (...) Frank Filz ---...--- Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
|
See: (URL) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
|
This is quite a common Lugnet problem. It has been discussed before. Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
|
I'm getting them bounced to me too :( -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 "Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:GMsBBr.AKv@lugnet.com... (...) weeks}} (...) forwarded (...) or (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mails from nowhere
|
|
"Jason J. Railton" <j.j.railton@cwcom.net> wrote in message news:GMsBBr.AKv@lugnet.com... (...) Yes. I am getting the same thing. I can only assume it is something to do with the way lugnet forwards those messages. And that somehow ubisoft's mail (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | E-mails from nowhere
|
|
Just recently I've been receiving emails of messages I've posted to Lugnet marked as 'undeliverable mail'. Each takes the form of: ---...--- Your message To: lugnet.loc.uk@lugnet.com Subject: {{message title}} Sent: {{date of posting}} did not reach (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET found on serach engine...
|
|
(...) Links within LUGNET pages actually call jump.cgi, this may affect the ability of search bots to count the pages they link to. That shouldn't affect links within non-LUGNET pages pointing to LUGNET pages, though. I'm not sure how LUGNET handles (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET found on serach engine...
|
|
(...) Interesting, my first two pages are my way out of date AOL pages. At least my top level Lego page shows up third. Interestingly, it has a description and category tag, who puts those there? It shows up as #48 in the Recreation > Collecting > (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET found on serach engine...
|
|
(...) Google lists pages in order of the amount of links made to them from other sites...i.e. if your page is linked to by many other sites, your page will be higher in the list. A good example would be to search for "Shiri Dori"...her acronym guide (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET found on serach engine...
|
|
Perhaps this isn't anything new, but I was a bit surprisd to see a LUGNET member's page pop up on a Google internet search. I've never seen that happen before, and somehow thought LUGNET was immune... Was I confused? Thanks, -Jon (25 years ago, 10-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another enhancement suggestion
|
|
(...) :-) Absolutely. It's actually near the top of our 'to do' list now. -Suz (25 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Another enhancement suggestion
|
|
Hi I just went to the members page (URL) (I assume the other sort orders are similar), and it took quite a while to load, being over 500K now. Maybe it's time to look at splitting it up into multiple pages, and maybe even a search function? ROSCO (25 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Need brickbay help!
|
|
(...) network (...) this (...) grinds and (...) Then i (...) am on a (...) happens, (...) an (...) its (...) no clue - seems to me that 64MB should be enough for BB, but it depends a lot on your setup/os/etc... FUT lugnet.market.brickshops since (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.brickshops)
|
| |
| | Need brickbay help!
|
|
Hi all, I am unable to get access to many brickbay stores- i keep getting a network error. Of course the computer i am on is a POS, but has anyone else had this problem? It seems to happen mainly to the larger stores- the computer just grinds and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
(...) Yes, and a high hit rate with no replies just tells you that a lot of people read your post but weren't interested enough to reply. Where's the benefit in that? -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (25 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
(...) A counter would only indicate the number of times a post had been chosen for reading - which can be swayed by the catchy-ness of the title, the popularity of the poster, etc. Hence the hilight button at the -end- of messages. Posts with titles (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
(...) Sorry to butt in this way, but since everyone hates me anyway -- I just don't care!!! I am mystified by these threads about how crummy Lugnet is because everyone is cross-posting stuff and everyone has to be bothered reading it, and how it is (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
(...) I think the primary problem with counters on posts is that it won't tell you much because they won't include people using NNTP. It will only count people like me that use the web interface. Eric (25 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Counters (was:THE POSTING BLUES)
|
|
(...) That's a really cool idea - This could allow people to see that their posts are being read, even if they don't get the response that they are looking for. Of course, counters on people's pages usually do the trick as well - you know people are (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Maybe :) just to see if I can though :) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) LOL! And yet you set mine up to do it? :) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) heh, probably not - I wouldn't be able to post then! I never found any reason to get my box to be able to type hebrew :) Dan (25 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Congrats! I'm sure y'all will do a great job. (Dan, can I chide you into getting hebrew posts to work? <grin>) Seriously though, all the best. -Shiri (25 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spammers are harvesting here
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
(...) You're right, we don't. Wierd. I thought some-one had said they were going to do it. Should I just email to "admin@lugnet.com" to add it? Are we happy enough with it as is to actually get it added? (25 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
(...) Its not that really, look at the counterpart US page... (URL) are no links to ORG websites there. The links only show up when you go down one more level to the ORG newsgroup. For example: (URL) just looked like the VLC link on the general (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
(...) In the case of NALUG, it's because we're lazy. We've got a homepage at: (URL) we haven't gotten around to informing the Lugnet admin of it... James (25 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Oddity on the Canadian ORG page.
|
|
I am just wondering why there is a link to the VLC website from the CA org page... (URL) it isn't a mistake shouldn't all CA LUG's have a link there ;-). They do have a link on the VLC newsgroup page so that is right. Just thought it was wierd, Eric (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) I think this would be groovy, and I've got my own 0.02USD to toss in... 1. Choose a new newsgroup name carefully. My newsreader (Forte Agent) sorts my list of subscribed groups alphabetically. So "lugnet.spotlight" would get buried in the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) yah, just like that! :) now, we all have to wait two more years before anyone mentions this again! *grin* Dan (25 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) Perhaps something like this? (URL) article is nearly two years old! Fredrik (25 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) yet (...) a (...) interesting idea... something like the server statistics, posting once a day to a group, listing the top stories? I think I like it :) Dan (25 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) This just sparked an idea... As an nntp user, the sportlights are almost invisible to me. Would it be possible to autogenerate a crosspost of some sort when a post makes the spotlight list? Just something to mull over... (25 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Thanks for proving my point for me, David. People use the database all the time, some more than others, but it still gets used. It's just less useful to me now that I've cataloged roughly 98% of my collection. -Dave (25 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) OMG, don't even say that! I'm using it so much it's hard to imagine what it'll be like without it! (...) Yep. (...) - David (25 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
Heh! I agree with both of you guys! BTW Larry, who made you LUGNET's policeman? You just wish you had as much creativity and talent as Eric. :-P (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
I agree with everything said here Eric, (...) Truth be told, I only saw this recently, a few weeks ago, I meant to pass on my congrats through e-mail but forgot completely, sorry. :-( (...) Amen! when I was just getting started with showing off my (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Actually, Kevin, I do remember...and thanks! The scans were incredibly useful to me at one time, as I'm sure they are useful to others now. I do check them from time to time, as I haven't memorized them yet. :) They were most useful in (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Of course I do. It would be nice to see scans for certain UFO sets that weren't there last time I checked. Personally, I don't care about new instructions. I care about new inventories. Printing complete sets of new instructions is a no- no. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Presumably you're clear on WHY Brickshelf doesn't go right to the very newest set and support that position, right? Someone asked that the very newest Harry Potter set instructions for Hogwart's Castle be scanned. Rather thoughtless of that (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Do you remember what it was like before the scan archive? If it's really not all that useful anymore I could take it down and save a few Mbit/s :) Seriously, the instructions and set inventories have very little functional overlap. Those (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) LUGNET's address (in Belmont, MA) will discontinue in a few weeks. -Suz (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Nah -- I'm a cold hearted mercenary, who'd do and say anything to pay the bills! :-, But I left Novell a little over a year ago. I didn't like the new direction they were going (hint: it involved laying off my wife, who was perpetually (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) (Mine is actually stable for at least another 10 months.) (...) paypal@lugnet.com (...) I would think of looking there too, now that you mention it. I'm not sure it really belongs there, however, because the sign-up process involves filling (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) <fun> What? Sproat! I thought you were a cold hearted Novell junkie like me - no open source anything! You want to know? Cough up some cash! not like Dan and all his "it's free, and i made a change and they implimented it" software :) </fun> (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Sometimes trying is a good approach. Try this one if you're so inclined: suz@baseplate.com which seems to be a valid addy for PayPal. (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Which reminds me to ask what the current PayPal address is, if you don't mind my asking (it's not on the "become a member" page which was where I thought to look)... (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) LUGNET doesn't generate enough funds to support itself. Todd and I carry the hosting, etc. and none of us see any money for what we do. All time is volunteered. Donations are always welcome and very appreciated. Which reminds me: currently, (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I have to agree, I've sent Dan a few updates for the information on LUGNET DB and the info was updated within hours (in most cases within minutes!). Great job! Congratulations! - David (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Well I've been dinged in the past for suggesting how to implement things, but I'll venture to offer that an enhancement request tracker doesn't have to be NEW code and doesn't have to be done HERE. Sourceforge has a pretty good one, (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) I too would like to take the moment to exclaim me too. :-, Perhaps a "me too" checkbox would be in order too (just kidding :-) (...) This would be really keen and everything, but it really depends on two things: the capability of the (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) That's what I've heard. :-, At any rate, best wishes to Steve, Jenn, and Dan -- it's quite the chore but it must be rewarding too. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A little function I would like to see.
|
|
(...) Are you OK with an avalanche of "me too" posts like this one? Either that or maybe an enhancement tracker would be nice to have. (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | A little function I would like to see.
|
|
Ok, I hope this does not start an avalance of requests but I just thought that with all the new admins that I would make a small function request that I would like to be able to take advantage of. I would love to be able to define a sig (signature (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev (and 1 other group), Bram Lambrecht wrote: \> > heh, yah - put it on the member page under activity, or (...) heh, yah - except there are a lot of other things that need doing more :) *grin* Dan (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) It's just a SMOP(1) after all. But where is it on the priority list? In fact, can we SEE the priority list? Or even dynamically change it by voting for what changes we think are important? That would be neat. (although that too would require (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Top 10 posters in lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) Hey, now that you're an admin, this is within your power, isn't it? :) --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) Duane, Thanks for pointing out exactly where I was going with my argument. He screwed up and got shot down for the language abuse. We can remember the lesson, move on, and all be better for it. -Dave (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Then you'd be wrong. -Dave (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) WOOHOO!!!! Not THAT would be a useful item here at LUGNET. Far better than Brickshelf's instructions database that is updated through 1997. Knowing what parts are in sets helps me decide what to buy and I know I'm not the only one who uses (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
We're also very happy to be on the team, and are very excited to be here. I hope y'all will be patient with us, since it will take a while to understand the code for LUGNET, which is a huge project. :) Dan (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Well, I'd rather not speak for Steve, but I can point you in some directions about him, specifically: (URL) for Dan and myself, let's see... We've been DB admins for the LUGNET Guide since June of 2000, we run (URL) (including the peeron inventories (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Congrats on the new positions. eric (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Welcome and congrats. For some of us folks who are a little rusty on our LUGNET history, maybe introductions/backgrounds from Steve, Dan, and Jennifer might be nice... what do you say, guys? Again, congrats! - Steve (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I think that's on a to-do list somewhere. :) Jennifer (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) I think that there is a distinction, however small, between JAL's post and Matt's post. I don't want to get in to that though - I don't feel that it's constructive. The thing about Matt's post that I find offensive is the subject line. A (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) The good news is you're not bitter about it. :-) Why don't we move on... Jude (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Does this mean we may see links to Peeron inventories in the Lugnet Database in the near future? :) (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) It's hard to respond to a fortune cookie, but if you mean that this path leads away from past mistakes, I have a question for you: Is Jesse Alan Long still banned? I would love to hear that his posting ability was re-instated, and that Lugnet (...) (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you didn't bother to actually read the thread I pointed to. eric (25 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
