Subject:
|
Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 23:28:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
188 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Dave Johann writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Jennifer L. Boger writes:
> > > I think that's on a to-do list somewhere. :)
> > >
> > > Jennifer
> >
> > WOOHOO!!!! Not THAT would be a useful item here at LUGNET. Far better than
> > Brickshelf's instructions database that is updated through 1997.
>
> Presumably you're clear on WHY Brickshelf doesn't go right to the very
> newest set and support that position, right?
>
> Someone asked that the very newest Harry Potter set instructions for
> Hogwart's Castle be scanned. Rather thoughtless of that person, don't you agree?
Of course I do. It would be nice to see scans for certain UFO sets that weren't
there last time I checked. Personally, I don't care about new instructions. I
care about new inventories. Printing complete sets of new instructions is a no-
no. Printing a couple of steps shouldn't be too bad as long as there is a
purpose behind it (i.e.-to show where a part goes). Besides, I feel sorry for
anyone who actually needs the instructions for the Lego Racers sets...and you
know those folks do exist!
-Dave
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
| (...) Presumably you're clear on WHY Brickshelf doesn't go right to the very newest set and support that position, right? Someone asked that the very newest Harry Potter set instructions for Hogwart's Castle be scanned. Rather thoughtless of that (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
