To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 26504
26503  |  26505
Subject: 
Re: Some more infos on new trains (they were partly presented in Frechen/Germany)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:56:47 GMT
Viewed: 
3715 times
  
In lugnet.trains, John Barnes wrote:
In lugnet.trains, Jason J. Railton wrote:

I suppose (and it would have made more sense to check your reply before adding
my other one - I'm splitting my own train of thought here) that the new IR base
length makes it harder for LEGO to produce a new engine that can sell on its own
(like the Super Chief) that doesn't contain an IR unit.

And it also makes a small engine impossible.  This is for kids, right?  Kids who
are supposed to grow up with Duplo Thomas?


Agreed! I posted earlier that this 30 stud base totally wipes out all those cool
Thomas and little trolley models. (Which, incidently, are amongst the most
popular items we (LUCNY) run around the tracks at shows per visitor requests.)
Even the Hogwarts model will not be able to be replicated with the new system!

JB

Surely for a Thomas train, if you make the bogie versions, Annie or Clarabel
could use the IR unit baseplate?
http://www.pegnsean.net/~railwayseries/annieclarabel.htm  Then Thomas could be
made using BBB wheels and he could have working rods too.

I think it will be possible to bury the new IR unit in an 8 or wider engine,
possibly to use it for remote controlled lights or auxiliary motors (crane
drive?), with electric wheeled 9V train motors driving.

The new 9V train motor can be used at the back of the train (with a wire to the
other train motors) to reduce drag on the curves, whilst still allowing an
electrical dead section of track (isolated with insulating tape between metal
rail joints) to be not much longer than the engine.  This assumes a train at a
show that is not regularly rearranged of course.

If a new train set like the Santa Fe loco were created with a plain 30-stud long
base and spaces in the right places, it would be possible for it to be used with
either system.  For the new system the fuel tank would be discarded.  There
would still be the question of which motor frame parts to include though - ones
with holes for the new motor or studs for the existing one.

Mark



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Some more infos on new trains (they were partly presented in Frechen/Germany)
 
(...) Hear, hear, those four wheeled Annie and Clarabels are a travesty created by the TV series ;-) (...) <SNIP> There (...) I think the 'with holes' one, Its backward compatible even if it doesn't look as good. Tim (18 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Some more infos on new trains (they were partly presented in Frechen/Germany)
 
(...) 30 studs would be very long for Annie and Clarabel - I was thinking of trying an MOT 24-stud baseplate. After all, they must have some use (other than a Palethorpe's Pork Sausage three-axle van of course). Maybe you could get away with BBB (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Some more infos on new trains (they were partly presented in Frechen/Germany)
 
(...) Agreed! I posted earlier that this 30 stud base totally wipes out all those cool Thomas and little trolley models. (Which, incidently, are amongst the most popular items we (LUCNY) run around the tracks at shows per visitor requests.) Even the (...) (18 years ago, 10-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains)

45 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR