Subject:
|
Re: Draft of a new driver wheel
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:38:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2293 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, James Powell wrote:
| |
| |
That said, though, I think for freight locos I’d rather err a bit smaller
too, I guess. I have never seen a graph of engine population density vs
driver diameter so I’m guessing but I think smaller may be a bit more common
than say 5 or 6 studs across ala the Thatcher Perkins driver you show on the
other side. But I don’t see 4 as totally too large by any means. In fact I
think it’s a good choice.
|
Given 5 bricks=6 ft (a minifig), then 5 bricks is if anything, midrange.
engines I have data on here- 8P (DoG) was 74”, a UP FEF was 80”, J is 70”,
German 05 is 90”, NYC J3A 79”, GWR Castle 80”, German P8 69”
So, a 5 stud diameter looks about right to me.
James
|
How many of those are high speed passenger locos though? In terms of population
density, low speed freight locos were much more predominant and they had smaller
drivers.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Draft of a new driver wheel
|
| (...) Most of the above are passenger- DoG is a one off. But, the P8 was a bit more than a make up- there were 3800 of them built. :). Also, when you look at the UK, 9F's have a 60" dia wheel, which is small for most mainline locos- and I am (...) (21 years ago, 1-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Draft of a new driver wheel
|
| (...) Given 5 bricks=6 ft (a minifig), then 5 bricks is if anything, midrange. engines I have data on here- 8P (DoG) was 74", a UP FEF was 80", J is 70", German 05 is 90", NYC J3A 79", GWR Castle 80", German P8 69" So, a 5 stud diameter looks about (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
56 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
