Subject:
|
Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:10:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2099 times
|
| |
|
|
actually i was gonna pull the old "its the end of my first semester of grad
school and i was writing a few papers, resigning from lugnet, and just busy all
around."
this REALLY is NOT the way to bring something like this up. thanks for the vote
of no confidence
In lugnet.space, Keith Goldman wrote:
> Mr. Lenny, what's going on with the MOC highlight? While the current MOC the
> "Fugli" is without a doubt excellent and deserving of the spotlight, since the
> builder couldn't be troubled to post an announcement to Lugnet, should it really
> be there? Maybe it should, I'm just posing a question. I understand why the
> work of Japanese builders has been highlighted in the past, they have the excuse
> of a language barrier. I, for one, would like to see works featured by non
> CSF-clubhouse members, or at least CSF members who can be bothered to
> cross-post. You guys have your own private Idaho away from Lugnet, so it is
> difficult to understand why you (the clubhouse) keep attempting to dominate this
> forum. Let it go, open things up.
>
>
> I anticpate your argument that..."well Keith, these mocs get highlighted because
> they are the best of the best, not because of any agenda or bias."
> I'm not buying it Lenny, my friend, I'm just not buying it. There have been
> deserving mocs that have not made the highlight (none of them were mine, so I
> can't be accused of sour grapes), and I can provide you a list if you need it.
> Maybe this is all just a big coincidence, but since you guys (CSF clubhouse) are
> so sensitive to charges of elitism, you might consider opening up the "MOC
> Highlight" feature to a few people beyond your core group, or at least to those
> who can be troubled to post an announcment to this forum.
>
>
> Before anyone gets too excited, Lenny and I are buddies, and this has nothing to
> do with the ongoing drama surrounding his larger administrative duties.
>
> -Keith
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
| (...) My post had nothing to do with the speed at which you update the MOC Highlight, you are confusing that with my rant from a few months ago. In fact, you have been great about keeping it updated. (...) It isn't? Should I have taken it to the (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
| to answer my own post- the other reason why there hasnt been an update is that there has just been so many great mocs the past few days.. i didnt know how to pick just one. but im gonna make a list and get the really really good ones up there.. (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
| Mr. Lenny, what's going on with the MOC highlight? While the current MOC the "Fugli" is without a doubt excellent and deserving of the spotlight, since the builder couldn't be troubled to post an announcement to Lugnet, should it really be there? (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.space) !!
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
