To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 4271
4270  |  4272
Subject: 
Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 08:58:19 GMT
Reply-To: 
jrclark@nospam.aol./IHateSpam/com
Viewed: 
625 times
  
Mario Ferrari wrote:

I totally agree with Suz, and find this very disturbing. These are items
whose "rarity" is totally artificial, coming from a planned commercial
operation rather than from actual market movements, and IMHO this is a
violation to the rules.


A violation of which rules? Doesn't a numbered, limited edition of
anything automatically *create* rarity? Seems to me that most numbered,
limited editions don't even offer the #1 unit to the public, preferring
to give it to the president of the company, or the designer, or some
such. Doesn't that connote an actual (and non-artificial) rarity?

Is this the marketing strategy with which TLC plans
to increase its presence on the market? What should we expect next?


Hopefully, more risk-taking and innovation that will keep them from
going stagnant. To my mind, LEGO Direct has been batting between 950 and
1000. Also, please do not confuse TLC with LEGO Direct. The former is a
corporate behemoth, which seems be having trouble getting things right.
The latter is a skunkworks, which seems to be having trouble getting
anything wrong.


I could agree with this auction only if the money went for some charity, but
this isn't clearly stated anywhere.


Do you mean you would still feel LEGO Direct's behavior was
inappropriate, but at least they were doing something wrong for a good
cause?

I thought LD has been very clear from the start that the first few
numbered sets would be auctioned off on ebay. Why wasn't there any
outcry prior to this? My impression was that since noone spoke up,
everyone thought that this was a good way to distribute these sets.

But maybe I'm the one off in left field. Wouldn't be the first time...
;-)

Rick C.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
 
"Rick Clark" <jrclark@nospam.aol.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:3CAAC42B.300060...aol.com... (...) but (...) Rick, I admit my fault here: I didn't know this was their original plan, and didn't realize it was clearly stated from the beginning. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LD's Auctions (Re: Going once, going twice, sold!)
 
(...) I totally agree with Suz, and find this very disturbing. These are items whose "rarity" is totally artificial, coming from a planned commercial operation rather than from actual market movements, and IMHO this is a violation to the rules. Is (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

38 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR