Subject:
|
Re: Official LEGO Color Chart
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:08:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3580 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger wrote:
> The way I see it, we probably will never switch to calling colors by
> their LEGO names - some, like 'Lig. Yellowich Orange' just don't work
> for me :)
What's wrong with it? "Lig." is an abbreviation for "light" (not the one
we're used to, but...), "yellowich" is only one letter different from
"yellowish"...ah, you must object to their use of the strange foreign word
"orange", right? ;P
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Official LEGO Color Chart
|
| (...) On further comparison, "Lig. Yellowich Orange" is the only color that uses the spelling "yellowich", while every other use is spelled "yellowish". I propose that the C-spelling is a typo and should be corrected. (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Official LEGO Color Chart
|
| (...) The way I see it, we probably will never switch to calling colors by their LEGO names - some, like 'Lig. Yellowich Orange' just don't work for me :) It would be nice to correlate the names we use to the entries in the table. For that matter, (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
49 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
