| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger wrote:
> The way I see it, we probably will never switch to calling colors by
> their LEGO names - some, like 'Lig. Yellowich Orange' just don't work
> for me :)
What's wrong with it? "Lig." is an abbreviation for "light" (not the one
we're used to, but...), "yellowich" is only one letter different from
"yellowish"...ah, you must object to their use of the strange foreign word
"orange", right? ;P
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, David Laswell wrote:
> "yellowich" is only one letter different from "yellowish"
On further comparison, "Lig. Yellowich Orange" is the only color that uses
the spelling "yellowich", while every other use is spelled "yellowish". I
propose that the C-spelling is a typo and should be corrected.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, David Laswell wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, David Laswell wrote:
> > "yellowich" is only one letter different from "yellowish"
>
> On further comparison, "Lig. Yellowich Orange" is the only color that uses
> the spelling "yellowich", while every other use is spelled "yellowish". I
> propose that the C-spelling is a typo and should be corrected.
I've no doubt that it's a typo, but that's what they gave us, we didn't want to
touch it just yet :)
Jennifer
|
|
|
