Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 03:25:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2291 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Bram Lambrecht writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > Three choices -- neutral, excellent, way excellent -- no bad.
>
> That's another way you could arrange the form:
>
> Comments? * No comment * great post * excellent post [Submit]
>
> where * is a radio button.
I was just saying "neutral, excellent, way excellent" in reply to something as
a means of clarification. We'd actually like to avoid any kind of qualitative
judgment type words in the choices.
By saying "Highlight" and "Spotlight" (assuming these are clear -- and maybe
they aren't quite clear enough yet) it's not really asking someone to make
any kind of "good" / "great" / "excellent" judgment, but simply to ask whether
or not the post ought to be highlighted or included in the Spotlight page.
It's still subjective as to _why_ or _when_ to suggest Highlight or Spotlight
(that's everyone's personal preference, naturally) but it's objective about
what's being suggested.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
