Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:47:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm&antispam&.org
|
Viewed:
|
1418 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Franks <spontificus@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It does have some benefits - how would the "off-topic" button work though if
> the message was cross-posted, and assuming that it wasn't off-topic in every
> group? Also - that is a problem with any cross-posted message - it might be
> great in one group, but not in another - there are quite a few examples of this
> already!
Yes, that's a point I hadn't thought of. Hmm. Since having the off-topic
score is really important to this whole concept, it might have to be kept
seperately for each group the message was posted in. Yuck. (But that's also
a problem with the current system.)
> Also - if you like the message, do you rate it? Or do you only rate messages
> that you REALLY REALLY like? This one might actually work itself out - not
> everybody will rate the latest pirate jungle, but a lot more people will rate
> the latest news from LD, thereby giving it greater prominance. But it is
> perhaps best not to assume that it would work that way, eithout further
> consideration?
Oh, I think that's exactly how it'll work out. Additional points:
- having to put less thought into weighing exactly how much each message
is "worth" makes the process less tedious, and therefore something more
people are more likely to do.
- with the current system a there's not much of a way to tell the
difference between a message two people liked a lot and one 100 people
liked a little bit.
- I actually think that a large number of people wouldn't make use of the
scale anyway. Since scoring articles means going out of my way, I only
bother to do it if I think it's something people _really_ should see and
I rate it 100.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) this (...) Well, I'm no computer whiz but it doesn't seem like it'd too hard. After all, on the page after you post there are links to every group you posted in, and those are created on the fly, isn't that so? ...so how hard is it to create (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) There are two ways, currently -- but they're designed to work without getting in the way (rather than to be obvious). First way: If two people like a message a lot (and, say, each mark it 100), then it has a lower composite score than, say, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) Hey.. there's a cue for dead-horse floggage in this group ;-) (...) It does have some benefits - how would the "off-topic" button work though if the message was cross-posted, and assuming that it wasn't off-topic in every group? Also - that is (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
