Subject:
|
Re: Discussion of Train Table Sizes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:57:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2756 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains.org, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.trains.org, Jonathan Reynolds wrote:
(snip)
> > the NBLTC modular layouts do not as every layout for every show has been a
> > different shape and size with a variance in contributors.
>
> That is typically the case for MichLTC layouts as well, unless we didn't have
> time to plan and ended up using the same track plan from a show that worked well
> before.
>
> >
> > I note that the 'stored' lego layouts tend to remain the same for each show, or
> > at least the individual modules remain largely unchanged, if not the
> > arrangement. For pain or pleasure, our collaborative efforts have required
> > custome built scenery nearly every time.
>
> Yes. But I think you guys may be working too hard, not sure.
Thanks Larry.
I happen to think we are working too hard but for most of us, the challenge of
building something new and interesting was just as much fun as presenting and
exhibiting. My preference is now for a more permanent build which would still be
quite flexible when arranged with other modules. I detect others in the NBLTC
are also coming around to the idea, if only to save valuable time.
As my 'modules' (well, the lego that sit on top of the tables) are set out on a
similar table top baseboard in my loft, I'm trying to future-proof my building -
this is really a way of getting the most value out of the time I have for the
hobby. An example of this is a module section which features a cutting, a bridge
and a 90 degree bend to fit in with the loft layout but will be used as a
straight section for displays (or of course a 90 degree bend). With a bit of
careful planning, I'm hoping to make the hill bits modular too so they can be
swapped around to suit the track layout. This is a huge benefit of using lego
which is rarely exploited.
Another way of 'future-proofing' your scenery is to start with the shell of a
building only but allow a future interior/exterior detail to be added. This way,
you can reach a visual standard fairly quickly but you may not get bored with
the model so soon - there are always bits to add/modify. Of course, the other
approach is to tear the thing down and start again!
Getting back to the exhibition discussion, the use of more permanent scenery
means that, if asked to display, it's less of a commitment, at least in
preparation, to say 'yes'. It would be nice to have an 'exhibition ready' layout
at short notice so we could do more of these shows.
Jon
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Discussion of Train Table Sizes
|
| (...) Great question, and one that I might have some insight on, since I am on a number of different club mailing lists. The answer is "it depends". I would say that the majority of clubs do not practice setup in advance but just turn up on the day. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
