 | | GWLTS photos
|
|
Yesterday, 16:Nov, was the Great Western Lego Train Show (GWLTS). This was a display by the North British Lego train Club of a layout at STEAM the museum of the Great Western Railway in Swindon (UK). Our display received a lot of attention from (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Honey, I shrunk the Chateau!
|
|
(...) John it came out great!I still love the way the pillers came out in your building.I liked it so much I incorporated pillers into one of my latest blocks (URL) using my fav. color to build with right now(tan and dark gray).Chris MichLTC (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Honey, I shrunk the Chateau!
|
|
(...) Thank you, Richard. Actually, I could have, but I have forsaken cyprus trees because I prefer to build my own trees instead. I do have four trees that I plan to "plant" in front of the chateau; I just didn't include them in the pics. Pics of (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"Iain Hendry" <militaryduckjock@rogers.com> wrote in message news:H5pMAM.Dqw@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) routes (...) We (...) Which is exactly why they are building a new one. The new one (which you can see under construction really well from a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Congrats! You created a really cool model. I like the details on the wheels + bogies most.... Thanks for sharing the link. Leg Godt! Ben (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: train single buffer
|
|
I was in some later sets too, like (URL) is no image of this part but you can see it here: (URL) was hardly used after 1980, only in 7720 and 7722 AFAIK. BR S tim david <talltim@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H5ny21.A4p@lugnet.com... (...) (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Honey, I shrunk the Chateau!
|
|
(...) Very impressive John. I especially liked the use on the tree's on the origional version, they seemed to add a sense of grand scale. Its a shame that you could not fit those at the front of the new version. Richard (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"Derek Raycraft" <derek.raycraft@sitraka.com> wrote in message news:3DCFDECA.704060...aka.com... (...) You are so good. Iain (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"Lewis Valentine" <lewisv@nitorco.com> wrote in message news:H5F9tK.KL5@lugnet.com... (...) rather (...) Load bearing tyres on a horizontal axis provide the support and motive traction; wheels pressing laterally against guide rails provide steering (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:H5F8uH.HHJ@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) I was actually really dissapointed with DFW's AirTrain. Certainly ahead of it's time, with more than 30 stations and trains following different (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3DD00B28.EB4662...ing.com... (...) Yes, many! Adtranz is a very common supplier, Matra has a VAL 256 at O'Hare, and a 206 at Orly in Paris. A few airports have Otis HOVAIR shuttles, including (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
"Ed McGlynn" <ejmcglynn@netzero.net> wrote in message news:H5H48q.1MD@lugnet.com... (...) DFW: (...) terminals (...) DFW is geting Adtranz's first Inovia shuttle. It's an updated of their very successful design based on the original Westinghouse (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Thomas' Annie, Claribel; and some Troublesome Trucks
|
|
With the advent of the new "Yoda" brown, a decent color finally exists to model the 2 cars Thomas the Tank Engine always pulls: Annie and Claribel. After scouring Bricklink for dozens of necessary 1x1s and the like (thanks, guys!), I present a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Honey, I shrunk the Chateau!
|
|
When I built my chateau a few years back, it was simply an exercise of love-- bulk bricks had just become available, and the doors to creating larger and more complicated and detailed MOCs were opened. It, however, became this large labor of love (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: A project idea for someone...
|
|
(...) -you haven't heard the best part of this one (in full size). To get a cow to market, you needed two calfs as well. (that or 2 cows...). The cars had to be reasonably ballanced in order to work. So, your cow went on one side, the two calfs on (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
(...) <snip description> (...) Very nice. I second these comments. 9 to 8 wide: COOL. later, James Mathis (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: A project idea for someone...
|
|
(...) For anyone who is thinking 12v Center (URL) as Pusher, Midline, and as Lead. Go nuts! (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | A project idea for someone...
|
|
Here is an idea for a radical steam train monorail - it could easily be done using a single rail of old 4.5V track or possibly 12V center track: (URL) you will even be modeling real prototypes... -Matt :) ---...--- www.insidethevault.com - (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing. What are the rods or tubes that go from the bodies to the truck centers? Are those somehow connecting with the tilt mechanism, or are they dampeners/stabilizers or ?? (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
(...) That's a beautiful looking train. Very nice detailing. Definitely looking forward to the LDRAW file. Thanks for sharing it. Play well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | New MOC: X2000 - the Swedish high speed train
|
|
Hi all I have put up some pictures of my latest MOC. (URL) is a model of the Swedish high speed train X2000. The original has a tilting mechanism to allow fast running through tight curves, but my model is only suitable for straight Lego track and (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.trains, lugnet.build) !!
|
| |
| | Re: train single buffer
|
|
(...) They also came with 7720 and 7722 for attachment to the 4.5 volt battery boxes that ran in back of the 4.5 volt engines. Wayne (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: train single buffer
|
|
(...) It is a end of 70's/end of blue area thing. It fits under the wagon-bases and the train-plates with motor-cut-out. See for example: (URL) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: train single buffer
|
|
(...) It came in a number of early 70's train sets, like 725. Paul (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | train single buffer
|
|
what set is this part (URL) train single buffer from, I was browsing through looking for a uk speed regulator when I found it and I can't find it in any inventories. (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) Thanks for the feedback, James. Like I said, I tried to use as many standard pieces as possible. Besides the regular baseplate, it also uses one of the 4x6 truck plates with the central technic pin, and the front wheels can be adapted pretty (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) running on it! Seriously, tell Ross not to try anything *too* spectacular ... I'm running out of black bricks, plates, and slopes, and I'm not sure I can keep up anymore. Every time he posts a new design, I run off with a dozen different (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Stefan Garcia writes: Thanks for the comments, Stefan. (...) Hmmm, methinks the tender is the Achilles tendon? ;) Actually, I spent very little time on the tender itself, throwing it together in about 90 minutes. All of your (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) I can't wait to see how those pistons work. Lookin' forward to those instructions! Great steamer! I've three suggestions though; a) the tender (IMO) would look better if it were slightly elongated and if the slopeback were given a bit more (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
(...) Shaun, I really like how you used a standard train base plate for the foundation of this steam locomotive model. I love how you disguised this base plate at the piston/cylinders with the hinged panel; dropping it SNOT-wise at a slight angle to (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
Hey Shaun- Good idea, and nice MOC! It is a rare engine indeed that can both look the most detailed it can AND be highly functional as well. I am going to ask Ross to take on your challenge of modifying your design and see what he comes up with-- I (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) I'm glad to have been of service :-) Yes, you rendered it about right according to the instructions I gave. One of these days I'll get around to posting some of my TD doodles on Brickshelf. Maybe even today. --Bill. (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | New MOC: 4-4-4 Steam Engine
|
|
Hi All, In a massive departure from my usual modus operandi, I finished up my latest project last night; a 4-4-4 steam engine. The uncharted territory (for me at least) comes from the fact that (a) the steam engine is *6-wide*, and (b) it is not (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.trains) !
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
Now THIS is a very good switching yard (the 'to download' one). Great 'extra' advantage: there are pairs of L en R switches, the way we often have to buy these things! I'm definitely going to build it these days. Keep designing guys! I love this (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) Have a boo at my take on Bill's switching yard: (URL) did a TD from his instructions, as others here have, and then I modified it a bit so that the switches for the points are not overlapping the ties of adjacent tracks. Both layouts are shown (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) Darn it! Well, it works great in track designer :-) I wish track designer had a way of pointing out that kind of issue. It's a bug!! But the good news is that 2 switches can be replaced by two straights and a switch, you can replace two of the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) Agreed. I have tried it and the part that sticks out for the switch arm will overlap part of the track beside it. Unfortunate, but that's the facts. Keep trying though, and let us know how you make out. Play well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
Sorry to disappoint you, but you can't connect switches like that. There has to be 1 piece of track between the switches, try it in real life, and wheep... Klaas H. Meijaard (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Switching yards that actually work
|
|
(...) <snip the very good text-list description> (...) Bill, You got me curious. I couldn't visualize the text description, so I built it up in Track Designer. Thanks for the very good construction description. Here's what I ended up with following (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) It's close enough that TD considers it to be connected, and that's good enough for me. I used it for the yard design I just posted (q.v.) --Bill. (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Switching yards that actually work
|
|
I've been dabbling with track designer, making switching yards. The latest thread on diagonal track layouts has given me some more tricks to get it to actually line up at the beginning and end with 8- or 16-stud intervals. The following issues make (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost a drug...
|
|
(...) I was not moderated due to technical difficulties. But they are there now. (URL) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.monlug, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
This has been an absolutely great thread, just packed with helpful ideas and findings (even some good track designs to get people thinking! Anyone want to volunteer to write up a summation and share it with Cary so it might get into the FAQ? Thanks (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) Does it work perfectly or does it go over in length by at least a half a stud? I couldn't tell from Track Designer. -chris (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: How's this for an idea ...
|
|
PNLTC has done this as well and found that it is a big hit. We've watched families "play" this together as a team effort... they'd spen sometimes an hour at it. We did several flavors of this too at different layouts, I think it started as a (...) (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) Here's some examples of non-standard connections I have played around with. All of these line up in Track Designer: (URL) if these links line-wrap. Folder is here when moderated, with TDL files: (URL) well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) THANK YOU!!! This works perfectly! I just tested it in Track Designer.... --Bill. (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) John is correct; it's 1-13-3 that works. Blame my faulty memory, it's been a bit since I played in TD. (...) The 2-7-2 is close enough that it connects physically very soundly. The offset is roughly 1 stud. Easy enough to cover with slop, with (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 4537 and 7722 Train cars for trade
|
|
(...) It is generally held to be, I believe. Posting for sale info isn't explicitly permitted in the header of the .trains group. I know that I'd be interesting in hearing more about your experiences in restoring these sets to their former glory (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 4537 and 7722 Train cars for trade
|
|
Don't know whether this is off-topic.... If interested look here: (URL) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) I don't have an equation, but I think one curve, 12 straights, one curve will do a dog-leg that is eight 32-stud baseplates long and 88 studs wide (3 baseplates minus 4 studs each side). -chris (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: SCLTC at Cal Stewart Show in Pasadena, California!
|
|
(...) Thanks Steve! We really have a lot fun adding the details for each show. We are very excited about the SDMRM show, 6 weeks in one spot! No setup and tear down within 48 hrs. Robert Powell SCLTC (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org.scltc)
|
| |
| | Re: Almost a drug...
|
|
(...) My Brickshelf directory is now moderated with pictures from the show: (URL) Brickshelf directory has lots of pictures too: (URL) still isn't moderated. :-( Play well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.monlug, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
(...) Thanks for the compliments, Larry. I really enjoyed building the Veranda Turbine a.k.a. "Big Blow". My inspiration for this model came from a new O scale model that was shown in the November 2002 Magazine "Classic Toy Trains" on page 136. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: How's this for an idea ...
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) VLC did this for the first time last weekend, and the kids loved it. We'll make it a little easier next time, though, there were some things on there (eg the water cooler) that many kids didn't even know (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Kindergardeners help out the NGLTC
|
|
To day local kindergarteners helped out the North Georgia LEGO Train Club by making ornaments to decorate our tree at this years Children's Healthcare of Atlanta's Festival of Trees. The children are students at Matt Elementary school in Forsyth (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: How's this for an idea ...
|
|
(...) We find that people will spend quite a bit of time looking for everything on the list and will ask about things they can't find. The kids are especially excited to find Spiderman or Yoda. We also put some extra things on just for ourselves! (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: How's this for an idea ...
|
|
(...) Search and find in other ways as well: (URL) J-3 talks about his incorporation of a dragon head into the side of (you guessed it) Dragon Mountain... (J-3 to a tot: "Do you know *why* we call it "Dragon Mountain"?)-- just another fun little (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5
|
|
(...) Well, yes, saying merely "G" certainly opens up a can of worms since, as you mentioned, many scales utilize gauge 1 track. Scaling at 1:24 would simulate 30" I believe. But your point illustrates that, while there is much precision among some (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: How's this for an idea ...
|
|
(...) What is that one? Shaun makes a Guinness vanish? :-) Oh, you said TRUCK, not trick.... the #4 item threw me off a bit, what can I say? It should be noted that MichLTC has done these lists, for fun, the last couple of shows. We print them on (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) 3 (...) Now I'm nitpicking :-).... there is one good fit for 3 feet, which is TTN3 using the Brit scale for TT of 3mm to the foot: N gauge 9mm track fits perfectly. I used to build Isle of Man Railway to (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5
|
|
(...) Noted and apology accepted. However for ME to know what you're talking about, it's first required for YOU to know what you're talking about. And that's a leap of faith I am not prepared to take without some supporting evidence. :-) (1) Next (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: SCLTC at Cal Stewart Show in Pasadena, California!
|
|
Again great layout guys! So much don't know where to start. I love that the base layout was created and now you guys are detailing. There's a lot of mileage in that approach. And the San Diego Model Railroad Museum (SDMRM) in San Diego’s Balboa Park (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org.scltc)
|
| |
| | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5
|
|
G uses O, O uses HO, and HO uses N, (...) gauge). G uses what? G in this context is of metre gauge anyway...gauge 1 uses O (SM32), but not for 3' gauge. G is #3 scale, on #1 scale track (or 1/2" to the foot on 1.75" gauge...)-at least, that is what (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
(...) I thought that too, when I saw this creation. It is a very annoying ride. I came across two links that describes the new "Automated People Mover" at DFW: (2 URLs) refer to the new APM that DFW's building to connect the new terminals to the old (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> Okay, okay. I was wrong thinking 0n3 meant 30" (dropping the "0"), but what fouled me up was your initial incorrect correction: Me: sort of like the popular scale On3, where you'd model in O scale (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) Oops. That should be the long leg and the hypoteneuse. John (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) What does work is 1-13-3. It's close enough that Track Designer will consider it a closed loop. You can turn it into a triangle with a 5-13-7-12-4-5 pattern (starting with curves and alternating with straights). Then it's easy enough to see (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Scales and Gauges (was Shay #5
|
|
(...) No, John. If you'd pay attention you'd learn something. The 3 means 3 FEET or 36 inches. NOT 30. This would be the third or fourth time you've been told that, and not just by me either (Jeff C is exactly correct). (...) And subsequent ones... (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) I thought that when numbers like this were used for narrow gauge they were in reference to the gauge of the rails in feet? As in On3 for 3 feet or 36" gauge while On2&1/2 was two and a half feet or 30" gauge. I've also heard of On2, but never (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) Ah, well, you lost me. I never said anything about 36"; the "3" in On3 is short for 30"... Actually, I was shooting from the hip in my initial post-- I just found that link after your post-- weren't you blathering something about HOn3? :-) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | AdeLUG's #5 - Write up
|
|
Here is the write up for the Adelaide LEGO Users Group meeting #5 It can also be found at the AdeLUG's website: (URL) - AdeLUG's #5, Sunday 10 November 2002 THEME - Moonbase Project VENUE - Holdfast Bay Community Centre, Hove (about 20mins (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.castle, lugnet.fabuland, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
(...) They were available in service packs, you'd get 8 concave (inner corner), 8 convex (outer corner), some top pieces (double sided slopes), and some regular slopes. These packes were great, too bad they don''t sell them anymore. As soon as they (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
"James Seibert" <james@vci.net> wrote in message news:H5G0AK.53D@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) [ ... snipped ... ] A couple of years ago LEGO released service pack 5216: (URL) was still available up until three or four months ago as I recall. I wish (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
After being inspired and awed by the train engines, I noticed the houses in the picture below. (URL) did you find all the black corner roof pieces for the houses in this picture? "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
Hi, Here is a page with some good prototype information: (URL) top of the page is the history of the system, the bottom shows the current implementation (including what happens if a tire runs flat...). Greetings, David (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) The 1-11-3 design isn't very close at all, according to Track Designer. Here's what I did: straight, curve right, 11 straights (5 switches and a straight, but that is equivalent), 3 curves right, cross-track. Then from the cross-track, a bunch (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) This is very interesting... Is there a similar formula for a dog-leg? 1 curve, X straights, 1 curve the other way? What equations/formulae would you use to compute this? It's been way too many years since I studied trigonometry... --Bill. (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
Hey that's really nice, I like the details. Eric (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) Since a couple people commented on this one I figured I'd mention that over the weekend I came up with a "folded-figure-eight" that avoids the use of points on the inner loop but still fits on my table: (URL) it requires one more curved track (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
(...) I think there are other airport transport systems which also use tired vehicles. (...) I seem to remember seeing pictures of the Paris subways with tires. If I'm recalling right, they had horizontal tires also which run against the walls of a (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) I stand corrected. The shays at Cass are indeed standard guage. (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: What a great time this is!
|
|
Steve Barile wrote in message ... (...) oppisite (...) VLC was showing this weekend, too, at the local NMRA chapter yearly show (Trains 2002) in the Vancouver area. We haven't posted new pictures since it was the same layout as we showed at (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
(...) Hmmm, The subway system in Paris France has trains that run on tires. I was rather supprised when I saw them. I don't remember exactly how they stayed on the track though. From what I understand the paris subway has several different styles of (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) One quibble on the above statement: Shays were also used on standard gauge, in fact, many of the larger shays ran on standard gauge. The Cass Scenic Railway is standard gauge. Frank (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
Interesting idea. It reminds me of the airport train in Dallas TX, not really a train, more of a automated bus running on a hotwheels track. It is a rough ride for sure. jt (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
(...) offset in the gray-top of the nose: (URL) general, thanks for posting all the photos. Excellent pics of excellent MOCs. later, James Mathis (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Train that runs on tires.
|
|
A while back at a rtlToronto dinner a bunch of us were looking through new catalogs when we came across the new Racers sets. I think many in the group had a similar thought but Iain was the first to vocalize it. Wouldn't it be cool to make a train (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: SCLTC at Cal Stewart Show in Pasadena, California!
|
|
The second batch of pictures have been merged with the first, so you will need to go through all 125 of them to catch the 56 new ones posted on Sunday. Note the inner sanctum of the layout (picture 123) which is not visible from outside the layout (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org.scltc)
|
| |
| | Re: What a great time this is!
|
|
(...) Umm... TWO in Canada- VLC also was displaying at Trains2002- I know, 'cause I was there! James P (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: What a great time this is!
|
|
(...) Plus one in Canada! (URL) that cool or what? (...) You got that right! And it just keeps getting better and better... (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Legoworld 2002 - a brief review (and a longer one)
|
|
Hi Ben, When I red your story I can only say one sentence: I've missed a lot. This year I haven't visited the event after a more or less bad experience last year because of the entrance tickets. Maybe that was the reason I didn't showed up. Well, (...) (22 years ago, 10-Nov-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.be, lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: SCLTC at Cal Stewart Show in Pasadena, California!
|
|
More pictures have been added to the site! There are now 125 images of our mountain layout. - Thomas (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org.scltc)
|
| |
| | What a great time this is!
|
|
This is so great! 2 wonderful shows back to back (SCLTC & NGLTC) on oppisite coasts. Actually there are shows all the time now! Boy these are the days! SteveB (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
(...) striping on the windshield as it worked out nicely! Digging those other two UP diesels too. One seems vaguely Alcoish (the one with the rounded cab roof and nose) while the other seems more EMDish (the one with the sloped cab roof and nose). (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
The NGLTC had a great time at the Atlanta Greenberg Toy & Train show this past weekend. We had quite a turn out of fine Train MOCs from club members: Lewis showed off his new Shay #5: (URL) had his Big Boy (not sure the version, I've lost count :) (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.loc.us.ga, lugnet.loc.us.ga.atl) !
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) while we're nitpicking, c /pouring/poring/ (1) (...) You need to read what you cite more carefully before you decide you should cite from it, because it pretty clearly says that what was once known as On2-1/2, and is NOW On30 is 30". Hence (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) hehe scale is a fun thing:-) (...) Now technically speaking (no pun intended), to use regular LEGO track gauge as narrow gauge (say 30"), you'd have to assume a technic fig to be 5 feet high and you'd actually have to build 18 wide to achieve (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) Nope. See: (URL) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Monorail MOC's - An Update
|
|
Thanks to various BrickLink suppliers, these are now "rendered in ABS" (...) (URL)and to make a single chassis Airport Shuttle (URL) (22 years ago, 10-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
