To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 18318
18317  |  18319
Subject: 
Re: Shay #5
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 01:43:58 GMT
Viewed: 
912 times
  
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.trains, Lewis Valentine writes:

Here are some pictures to my new Shay #5

Wonderful MOC, Lewis-- great attention to details!  As I was pouring

while we're nitpicking, c /pouring/poring/ (1)

over your
pics, it struck me that you have cleverly built past minifig scale to around
1:29.  Though you are 8 wide, Shays were a little over 9 feet wide.  Also,
Shays ran on narrow gauges, so utilizing LEGO gauge pushes you upscale
as well,
sort of like the popular scale On3, where you'd model in O scale (1:48), but
use HO scale track to simulate 30" gauge rails.

I think you meant 36", as 30" would be On2-1/2... (and is, I believe, what
use of N gauge track in HO scale is called, HOn2-1/2)

Nope.  See: http://hometown.aol.com/on30modeler/

Nope yourself. :-)

You need to read what you cite more carefully before you decide you should
cite from it, because it pretty clearly says that what was once known as
On2-1/2, and is NOW On30 is 30". Hence backing me up when I say that On3
means 36" and that you were incorrect to call On3 36" in your first post.

That aside, the model itself is incredibly nifty.

Why not just praise the model and let it go at that, instead of using it to
make points about stuff that you're actually not quite right about? Forget
lecturing Lewis about what scale he's in or should be in, and just enjoy the
model. It's a great model no matter what scale or gauge it's simulating.

1 - although since you're all wet about the scale/gauge thing I can see why
you'd use pouring :-)... as it's what you do with water.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Shay #5
 
(...) Ah, well, you lost me. I never said anything about 36"; the "3" in On3 is short for 30"... Actually, I was shooting from the hip in my initial post-- I just found that link after your post-- weren't you blathering something about HOn3? :-) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Shay #5
 
(...) Nope. See: (URL) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)

19 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR