Subject:
|
Re: Shay #5
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:24:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
938 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> Ah, well, you lost me. I never said anything about 36"; the "3" in On3 is
> short for 30"... Actually, I was shooting from the hip in my initial post-- I
> just found that link after your post-- weren't you blathering something about
> HOn3? :-)
>
> Basically what happens is that to model narrow gauge, you take track from the
> next smallest scale and call it 30"-- it's not perfect, but close enough.
I thought that when numbers like this were used for narrow gauge they were
in reference to the gauge of the rails in feet? As in On3 for 3 feet or 36"
gauge while On2&1/2 was two and a half feet or 30" gauge. I've also heard of
On2, but never On30, perhaps that's just an easier way of expressing On2&1/2?
Jeff Christner
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Shay #5
|
| (...) Ah, well, you lost me. I never said anything about 36"; the "3" in On3 is short for 30"... Actually, I was shooting from the hip in my initial post-- I just found that link after your post-- weren't you blathering something about HOn3? :-) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
