To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 18336
18335  |  18337
Subject: 
Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:40:04 GMT
Viewed: 
3127 times
  
In lugnet.trains, William R. Ward writes:
The 1-11-3 design isn't very close at all, according to Track
Designer.

What does work is 1-13-3.  It's close enough that Track Designer will
consider it a closed loop.

You can turn it into a triangle with a 5-13-7-12-4-5 pattern (starting with
curves and alternating with straights).  Then it's easy enough to see that
it forms a lesser know Pythagorean triplet, 5-12-13.  The angle formed by
short leg and the hypoteneuse is 22.62 degrees, which matches very close to
the curve track being 22.5 degrees.

John



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
 
(...) Oops. That should be the long leg and the hypoteneuse. John (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
 
(...) The 1-11-3 design isn't very close at all, according to Track Designer. Here's what I did: straight, curve right, 11 straights (5 switches and a straight, but that is equivalent), 3 curves right, cross-track. Then from the cross-track, a bunch (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)

27 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR