Subject:
|
Re: Hypothetical Space Warfare
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 26 Jan 2003 03:42:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1225 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman writes:
> The type and style of warfare will be defined by the technology used (energy
> shields vs. armor plates.. laser guns vs. ravioli cans)- and the issues of
> technology are almost entirely in the realm of possible imagination (neither
> provable or disprovable).
DING! DING! DING!
This is what I was trying to say...
Thanx, Lenny, for being so succinct. I have this problem with knowing
what I want to say, but having it come out incompletely and sometimes
incorrectly. Thanx for summing it up.
"I don't believe in the no-win scenario. I like to think there are
always possibilities." - Captain James T. Kirk, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Peace and Long Life,
Tony Alexander
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Hypothetical Space Warfare
|
| After reading some of the really cool discussions and points of view raised in responce to this post, I have been lead to an new conclusion: Meaningful discussion about the nature of space warfare is immeadiately bound by the technology used. This (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
