Subject:
|
Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:15:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
911 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Wayne R. Hussey writes:
> My "The Fifties" rocket ship might be classed capital. It is a fifties style
> ship of exploration. Although the shell is complete in these pics,
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2546
>
> the detailing is not:
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=2446
Wayne,
Ooh, it's good to see your fifties ship again, and nice to see some more of
the details. Is it still in existence, have you gotten any farther?
Thanks,
George
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
| (...) Thanks, George. Yes, it still exists. Currently it is in need of some minor reconstruction. I plan to show it at NWBrickCon - minus the detailing. That is due to the fact that for the last several months I have been working on my seven foot (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
| (...) No single number for minimum could be correct. There are three dimensions for a ship. All three must be taken into account. I suggest that perhaps 60 long by 24 wide by 16 tall would fit the smallest capital ship I can think of. (...) Small (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
