Subject:
|
Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sun, 1 Sep 2002 02:48:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1047 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin writes:
> In article <H1n62G.4I@lugnet.com>,
> "Troy's Surplus Lego" <legosales@tcphoto.net> wrote:
>
> > I got the impression that the intended use of the Death Star was to move
> > around the galaxy destroying planets. If this is actually the case, then I
> > think that the fact that it is mobile makes it a "ship" rather then a
> > "base". A "base" to me would be stationary.
>
> I think it's a "Battle Station."
>
> Who are we to argue with the Emperor?
A battle station with a hyperdrive, what a crazy concept.
(Travels from Alderaan, a core world, to Yavin, a rim world, in a day or two.)
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
| Well, from what I know of cap-ships: (...) 60 is what I would call the minimum. (...) Depends on the technology level of the race employing the ship. In my legoverse, a cap-ship can land on a planet and take off in under 10 minutes thanks to the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
