Subject:
|
Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 13:12:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
944 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, William R. Ward writes:
> So if I ever bulit a very large ship it would probably be a
> colonization ship, that would be designed to spend dozens or hundreds
> of years at near-light speeds, traveling to a nearby star system while
> people on board grow old and have families on board. And I wouldn't
> call it a "capital ship," even if it was 200 studs long.
Be sure to browse castle so you can make cows, pigs and sheep for your
colonization ship, you just know things will go wrong, and the people will
forget they're on a spaceship.
And watch out for muties!
George
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
| (...) Couple hundred. (...) No. It would burn up in the atmosphere. (...) N/A (...) Besides escape pods, no. (...) Military command ship. An Admiral's flagship, or any ship suitable for serving as such. Must be military, not civilian. But then, I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
