Subject:
|
Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 06:05:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1008 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <H1n62G.4I@lugnet.com>,
"Troy's Surplus Lego" <legosales@tcphoto.net> wrote:
> I got the impression that the intended use of the Death Star was to move
> around the galaxy destroying planets. If this is actually the case, then I
> think that the fact that it is mobile makes it a "ship" rather then a
> "base". A "base" to me would be stationary.
I think it's a "Battle Station."
Who are we to argue with the Emperor?
--
~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
| "Hendo (John P. Henderson)" <hendo@valyance.com> wrote in message news:H1M8My.ByM@lugnet.com... (...) I got the impression that the intended use of the Death Star was to move around the galaxy destroying planets. If this is actually the case, then (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
