Subject:
|
Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 03:47:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
909 times
|
| |
|
|
"Wayne R Hussey" <eskimo2@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:H1MyJp.7Iv@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.space, Jude Beaudin writes:
> >
> > Give some SF examples of 'capital ships'.
>
>
> Alien: Nostromo (freighter - multi-million tons, crew seven), Star Wars:
> Imperial Star Destroyer (destroyer - one mile long, 25,000? crew).
I don't care how hard it is do to, I would love to see a minifig-scale star
destroyer!
What would the scalimg be? 1 lug = 1 sq ft? That would require it to be
about 5000 (it IS about 5000 ft a mile, right?) lugs long! That would be
cool!
--
Markham Carroll
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
| (...) So would I! I've been using one stud = one foot for Minifig scale. A mile (5280 ft) could be well represented by 5000 studs. My calculations show that such a construction would be 1562.5 inches or 130.2 feet! At that size, you could (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
| (...) No single number for minimum could be correct. There are three dimensions for a ship. All three must be taken into account. I suggest that perhaps 60 long by 24 wide by 16 tall would fit the smallest capital ship I can think of. (...) Small (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
