Subject:
|
Re: Introducing the Moonbase Project
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:16:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2157 times
|
| |
|
|
Hey Brian. You sent me an email as well but I think its identical to this
so I'll just reply here. I haven't been able to get to that page yet. It
says something about it being 'down for maintenance' or something.
I also appreciate your thoughts on module conncetion, but unless a bunch of
other people speak up and say a similar thing I think we'll go with the
current method.
Thanks again!
-Jon
"Brian H. Nielsen" <70401.2635@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:H00M2G.8Jn@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.announce, Jon Palmer writes:
> > I was going to wait for Chris Giddens to get home from vacation but I • just
> > finished this page on his site (and I'm impatient) so I thought I'd • unveil
> > it:
> >
> > http://www.classic-space.com/moonbase01.html
>
> A long time ago I posted a link to my moonbase called Copernicus • City.
> My homepage has a link to it:
>
> www//ourworld.compuserve.co/homepages/brian_h_nielsen
>
> I havn't updated the web site with images of what I've built on it • since
> then, but it is now populated with several buildings - an expanded Ore
> Processing facility, a Refinery, a Tokamac reactor, a Factory, new Living
> Quarters (with an attached Recreation Area and a Greenhouse), an
> Observatory, and a couple Storage Buildings.
>
> When I can spare the time I'll try and make some updates to show it's
> current state.
>
> I really like your baseplate module approach. One possible improvment • to
> consider is the connection method between modules. When you only have to
> connect to one other modules the technic pins will work fine, but when you
> have to connect or disconnect with 2 or more preexisting modules it may be
> cumbersome. Imagine what you'd have to do to remove the center module • from
> a 3x3 layout.
>
> A possible alternative to the 1x2 technic beam is to use a 1x1 with • side
> facing stud, with the stud facing the outside of the connecting corridor.
> Now when you line 2 modules up you'll have 2 studs on the outside that you
> can lock together with any variety of 1x2 pieces. A 1x2 tile with raised
> bar, 1x2 tile with short thinwall, 1x2 with center stud, 1x2 plate, and
> probably others all work well, just don't use a 1x2 tile as it would be
> difficult to remove easily. Now removing, replacing, or adding a new • module
> is a breeeze anywhere in the layout. Also the 1x2 connector pieces can • add
> small architectual details - add 1x1 round translucent cones to those • 1x2's
> with center stud and you've got lights to illuminate the way for the
> vehicular traffic passing underneath! There are lots of possibilities.
>
> Brian
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Introducing the Moonbase Project
|
| (...) I didn't think the Email got through since I got a return message that it was undeliverable. Guess it made it after all. My mistake while typing in my homepage address. It should have been: (URL) Sorry for the trouble. Brian H. Nielsen LUGNET (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Introducing the Moonbase Project
|
| (...) My homepage has a link to it: www//ourworld.compus..._h_nielsen I havn't updated the web site with images of what I've built on it since then, but it is now populated with several buildings - an expanded Ore Processing facility, a Refinery, a (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
