Subject:
|
Re: Brainstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:18:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
634 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve,
Thanks for the quick feed back : ) Please take a look below ... &
LMKWYT.
-JSM
Steve Baker <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message
news:3D56C75C.4030006@airmail.net...
> > 6. A USB to I2C IAB
> Dunno how hard that is - but if we do it then we can use
> it to connect the IR brick to a PC...so we only need one
> IR brick type.
I was thinking that it could be used to hook up to joysticks, gamepads,
mice, etc...
> > 8. A pneumatic valve IAB
> Dunno - isn't it easier to use an RC servo for this?
OK. How 'bout a solid-state relay IAB and I'll use it to drive solenoid
valve ?
> 11. A battery pack with sensing logic for short cicuits, overloads, • overheating,
> etc. This should also have temperature and voltage sensors • readable via I2C
> (that's a single I2C chip!)
Yes ! Must have !
> 12. Depending on how the power is transmitted - if it's in the same • cable
> bundle as the I2C - then there needs to be an I2C-to-I2C connector • that
> DOESN'T transmit power across it. You need this to safely add • multiple
> battery packs.
I figure they'd be seperate cables. (see below)
> 13. Some way to make noises - there are sound chips for I2C - but we'd • also need
> a teeny-tiny speaker or something.
Yep, That'd be cool to : )
>
> But that makes all of these dinky little 2x4 stud devices *MUCH* larger • and more
> complex. Do we really need this?
Not if we get people to agree on Node ID ranges for various devices or store
the ID's in flash.
> I'd like most 'bricks' to be single I2C devices with a simple connector • for power
> and I2C - plus whatever is their function.
agreed !
> I'm not sure that gives us the connection density we need. We need:
>
> Power
> Ground
> I2C SDA
> I2C SCL
I figure we can supply all four with 2 existing cables/connectors per
module.
1 for power
1 for I2C. daisy chain them so you get the bus like you mentioned.
> > The discussion so far has centered on electronics and communications
> > methods, but I think BrainStorms should extend LEGO(R) in the mechanical
> > sense as well.
> I think it would be wise to make that a separate discussion.
OK. I'm not in a hurry : )
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brainstorms
|
| (...) So I imagine the need for a brainstorm brick that has a standard Lego wire connection on the top and a little I2C chip inside that would interface with existing motors and sensors. This would certainly be needed because nobody wants to butcher (...) (22 years ago, 11-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
53 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
