To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18607
18606  |  18608
Subject: 
Re: Brainstorms
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 03:38:35 GMT
Original-From: 
Steve Baker <SJBAKER1@AIRMAIL.saynotospamNET>
Reply-To: 
sjbaker1@airmail.netSTOPSPAMMERS
Viewed: 
787 times
  
Bruce Powell wrote:


My extensions, would be based upon a common addressing system ala Dalas
Semi 1 wire. This allows for simple stacking of 1wire devices.
Compiler/Interpreter keeping track of devices and their unique Serial #s.

Ooh - I'd forgotten the Dallas Semiconducter 1-wire interface - that would
work out really well.

Do Dallas still make a bunch of interesting devices for that standard?

A set of Controllers (CPU/RAM/ROM) as a single Module. Add on Modules for
more Ram/EEPROM/Flash. Don't seperate the CPU/ROM/RAM too much complications
for the basic unit. Definitly allow to be augmented though. Has multiple
1wire /I2C busses built in.

I2C has ROM and RAM devices that plug right into the I2C bus.  I think it
would be smart to have ROMs so that one could have 'toys' like Scout and
Microscout which are shipped with pre-designed behaviors for the kiddie
market without winding up with something like the Scout which is relatively
useless for serious work.

A Display Module series (Simple text -->>> Colour graphics)
Input Modules -- Switches, knobs, dials.
Output Modules -- Lights, etc.
I/O Modules Serial, I/R, Bluetooth, Ethernet......

With that lot, you could almost build Lego PDA's and cellphones!

ugh what a list. My basis, is Simple devices that can be clearly documented,
with some basic intelligence so they can be treated as Objects in
Programming & Putting them together. If these simple devices can't
economically support some basic intelligence, then add a CPU block who's job
it is to provide that basic intelligence, ie a sensor controller.

Yes - exactly.  By keeping the functionality per device *simple*, you should
be able to fit each component into a 2x4 stud brick.


----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net>   WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
URLs : http://www.sjbaker.org
        http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
        http://prettypoly.sf.net http://freeglut.sf.net
        http://toobular.sf.net   http://lodestone.sf.net



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Brainstorms
 
Elijah has IMHO a nice starting point for a series of modules for Robotics. My extensions, would be based upon a common addressing system ala Dalas Semi 1 wire. This allows for simple stacking of 1wire devices. Compiler/Interpreter keeping track of (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)

53 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR