| |
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> If there ever was brick image that was particularly risky to display in a
> logo, I would think it would be a red 2xN.
Yeah, as much as I think this whole "trade dress" thing is silly, I
agree 100% with Todd right here.
Don't get me wrong - I LOVE ldraw.org - I love all the hard work
that's gone into it. And maybe it's just the fact that I'm colorblind
that makes it easy for me to say this, but I think you'd be a LOT
safer changing the logo to something like a green brick, or maybe even
an orange brick. Maybe blue, but better something TLG has never used
and probably won't use in a logo.
--
The pieces you want and nothing else - easy online bidding!
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Sure, you could pay someone to run your LEGO auction.
Or, you could run it yourself for free:
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/ (Still in beta)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) I guess you'd be pretty surprised at some of the legal questions I've asked TLG out of the blue then! :-) Maybe I'm just weird like that. (...) That doesn't help me worry about it any less. But again, maybe I'm just weird like that. (...) Hmm. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
