Subject:
|
Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:04:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3641 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 02:29:55PM +0000, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
> Also, you'd specified earlier:
> {Subject, Message, Date, Author, Link to a related picture (optional),
> Link to the original message or to further information (optional)}
>
> I'd like to add things like Event Date Start, Event Date End,
> Theme(s), Age (e.g. kids or adults or all), etc.
>
> Is there anything else that should be added as a feature? Keep in mind
> that implementation of these features will depend on custom-developed
> XML generators and parsers/aggregators, so let's not get too wild. :)
Adding tags to the spec isn't "expensive" - and since clients won't be
required to implement support for new tags, unless they want to, I say,
let's think of anything we can want, and then decide if it's worth
adding to the spec or not. :)
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
| (...) Yeah, good point - I had my software developer hat on (lazy boy Kelly) and not the Visionary On The Mount hat ("all that and a side of fries!") you need for setting up something like this... BTW, I'd like to make sure appropriate people are (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks)
|
| (...) Sorry about that, got distracted! Mostly BrickFest, some other things. Back on it again, and your email from 1 August was very helpful in setting the direction for LENNI. (...) I think both Atom and RSS as a base would allow us to do this. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
