Subject:
|
Re: Lego Easter Eggs!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 04:55:30 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@iwantnospam.ctp.=SayNoToSpam=com
|
Viewed:
|
1362 times
|
| |
|
|
NS Comm 4 or 4.5 has the same behaviour. If you're relative pathing and
you started on your HD, you can navigate all over it, no worries. Good
for testing... BUT!
This will bite you if you're not careful. But relative paths are better
if you can use them because otherwise you have a lot of maint if you
move. I do all my HTML by hand. So I use them within pages for
references, and I use them for images, but I tend to hard code in jumps
to other pages. Not perfect.
A macro expander can fix this. For instance, Chainsaw... But I'm too
lazy to climb that curve so I keep doing it all by hand.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Lego Easter Eggs!
|
| (...) Wasn't the problem in this case that the path was _hard_coded, rather than soft, albeit hardcoded to the wrong place? :) Jasper (25 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: Lego Easter Eggs!
|
| (...) How so? Other than the standard problem of changing the directory structure, and not updating all the soft-links. My experience is that hard-linking bites harder and sooner. And often requires tetanus shots. Now, don't get me started on file (...) (25 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lego Easter Eggs!
|
| On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:10:28 GMT, Todd Lehman uttered the following profundities... (...) It was IE4. I had loaded it locally before uploading to make sure it looked passable, and that the side-frame link had worked. I then uploaded, checked from (...) (25 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
