Subject:
|
Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 04:45:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
689 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> Thank you for posting this. I have to ask, how accurate is your
> robot???
>
> I will admit, that i have rarely got even CLOSE to 100% perfect block
> placement.
My arm put the block down instead of dropping it, so it usually made good
contact. But it is usually not perfect. I only ran it a few times though
since I still got other problems to sort through.
> so will a longer time give you better accuracy??
No, the long time come from my slow gearing of the x/y movement, slow arm and
very slow software. Right now I got a generic algorithm that can deal with any
pattern, but it take 2 seconds to decide where to pick up a block, and then it
take another 2 seconds to decide where to drop it. The RCX is suppose to have
a 16Mhz CPU, but the RCX firmware is running my code like it is 4Khz. :(
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
| (...) Thank you for posting this. I have to ask, how accurate is your robot??? I will admit, that i have rarely got even CLOSE to 100% perfect block placement. so will a longer time give you better accuracy?? -- Chris Pretend this says something (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
