To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 3424
3423  |  3425
Subject: 
Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:52:18 GMT
Viewed: 
1841 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
> "Jeff Elliott" <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote in message
> news:3C56BD23.6EF3CC38@telepres.com...
> 
> > Then think about robot times.  I can't see a single picker finishing
> > anything but the simplest pattern in less than 15 seconds; I can easily
> > imagine someone having a functional robot that finishes in 50 seconds or
> > a minute.  But in the hot-competition range (say, around 20 seconds),
> > the margin will be only a few seconds.  So if you make the sloppy-block
> > penalty 1 second or 2 seconds, and the misplaced block penalty 10
> > seconds or so, you probably have a workable system.
> 
> This is the best idea I've seen yet. I wanted to suggest scoring via time,
> but because I hate math :) I couldn't bother trying to come up with
> something.

It isn't bad, and it is a far cry from Rob's idea of zero points for an
unsuccessfull design... :-/

> I am currently in the process of dissassembling my third attempt at building
> a robot for this competition.
> 
> 1) eCcentrica - never ran, structurally unsound
> 2) Quadro - ran, but couldn't build an EOAT, lost interest
> 3) Tijs - Ran, but far too uncontrollable, unstable, jumpy, not enough LEGO
> to build proper support structure (resorted to Monorail supports, looked
> horrid)
> 
> I leave for Florida for 2 weeks on Saturday. I'll have a week when I return
> to build something. Not good. :)

Good luck on putting out a design...
and have fun south o' the border... :)

Ben

pretend Iain is going to work on his tan in Florida!! :)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
 
"Jeff Elliott" <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote in message news:3C56BD23.6EF3CC...res.com... (...) This is the best idea I've seen yet. I wanted to suggest scoring via time, but because I hate math :) I couldn't bother trying to come up with something. I (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

30 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR