Subject:
|
Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:02:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
724 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys writes:
> K, heres the thingif we do head-to-head competitions, there are only 2
> bots involved at a time. There will be one winner and one loser. Just
> like the block sorting bots--every bot will eventually play every other
> bot in subsequent heats.
>
> The reason I dont appreciate stop watches is that someone has to use them.
> One person to each bot and the definition of done per person is grossly
> inaccurate. Since, at the rate were going, all these bots are going to be
> finishing close to the same time (under 40 sec for anti-X), there may be
> some disputes if someone thinks their bot finished before the timer is
> stopped. I know that in my program right now, the bot moves off the board
> when it places the last block, so you can see the entire surface and judge
> and/or set up for the next bout. Will timer guy click stop when the last
> block is placed, when the arm lifts off it, or when the bot parks off the
> board, or anytime inbetween? The less reliance on exacting mearsurements
> the easier I think the competition will be. I do have the bot beep when it
> thinks its done.
>
> Per head to head competition:
>
> 50 points for finishing first
> -10 points for incorrect blocks. We know theyre incorrect because theyre
> not in the square
> +5 points for good block (whether on side or just in square, not meshing)
> +10 points for every perfect (meshing studs) block
>
> Hard to dispute any of these criteria
>
> Heres how things may unfold
>
> Bot 1 finishes first +50
> has 2 incorrect 20
> has 4 good +20
> has 2 perfect +20
>
> for 70 points
>
> Bot 2, with a full set of perfect has +80 (bot 2 deserves to win in this
> instance, for bot 1 could have done the thing in 10 seconds but did a poor
> job doing it. Bot 2, taking a whole minute, but achieved a *perfect * run,
> is, imho, a better bot.)
>
> Heres the thing, if bot 2 has 1 incorrect block, tie score
> If bot 2 has 1 incorrect and one good, score down to 65, bot 1the faster
> bot, wins.
>
>
> If your bot is better (and it should be), the bout might look like this:
> Bot 1 (Runamok Design Team)
> +50 finishing first
> +50 (5 perfect)
> +10 (2 good)
> -10 (1 dropped because some kid, pointing at Chriss bot and saying, Hey
> Mister
accidentally knocked my bot, thus causing the block to drop)
> = 100 points
> Bot 2
> +80 (8 perfect blocks)
> = 80 points
>
> I favour speed insofar as the bot still attempts to make an x pattern.
> You get a bot that says its done at the beginning of the match, gets +50,
> but all those misplaced blocks will make sure it loses. If the random
> pattern has 6 or more correct blocks at the start (hopefully not!) is the
> only way a non-moving bot can win for sure. (+50 for finishing first, +60
> for 6 perfect, -20 for incorrect = total of 90)
So far, me likey!!! :)
> Over the course of the day, with subsequent matches, the faster bots will
> tend to win. Ben can add up all the wins at the end of the day and come up
> with an overall winner
ix-nay on enbay!!! I am going to Virginia that weekend.... the thing that
sucks...is I am off Thursday and Friday, but have to leave Thursday afternoon
for the flight. Won't be home until Sunday afternoon. Trip courtesy of
Uncle Sam.
<snip the rest...>
Ben
pretend I will be there keeping score!!!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
| K, heres the thingif we do head-to-head competitions, there are only 2 bots involved at a time. There will be one winner and one loser. Just like the block sorting bots--every bot will eventually play every other bot in subsequent heats. The (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|