Subject:
|
Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:17:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
679 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jeff Elliott" <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote in message
news:3C56BD23.6EF3CC38@telepres.com...
> Then think about robot times. I can't see a single picker finishing
> anything but the simplest pattern in less than 15 seconds; I can easily
> imagine someone having a functional robot that finishes in 50 seconds or
> a minute. But in the hot-competition range (say, around 20 seconds),
> the margin will be only a few seconds. So if you make the sloppy-block
> penalty 1 second or 2 seconds, and the misplaced block penalty 10
> seconds or so, you probably have a workable system.
This is the best idea I've seen yet. I wanted to suggest scoring via time,
but because I hate math :) I couldn't bother trying to come up with
something.
I am currently in the process of dissassembling my third attempt at building
a robot for this competition.
1) eCcentrica - never ran, structurally unsound
2) Quadro - ran, but couldn't build an EOAT, lost interest
3) Tijs - Ran, but far too uncontrollable, unstable, jumpy, not enough LEGO
to build proper support structure (resorted to Monorail supports, looked
horrid)
I leave for Florida for 2 weeks on Saturday. I'll have a week when I return
to build something. Not good. :)
Iain
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
| (...) It isn't bad, and it is a far cry from Rob's idea of zero points for an unsuccessfull design... :-/ (...) Good luck on putting out a design... and have fun south o' the border... :) Ben pretend Iain is going to work on his tan in Florida!! :) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
| OK folks, since I don't have a robot competing, perhaps I'll throw out some suggestions: Some scoring rules I've heard bandied around are: First to finish: +20 or +50... Block wrong: -10 or disqualified Block mispositioned: -5 I'd observe that in (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
