Subject:
|
Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:53:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
556 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> After a few days of discussion, this is a set of simple rules to
> calculate a score for 2 robots going head to head for the upcoming
> project X games.
> done first +20
Can we bump this up to 50? I want more priority on speed! As Daves example
shows, this scoring scheme seems to favour accuracy more than speed. Also,
if you have a misplaced block, you should get a score of 0. The whole point
of the game is to make the X pattern, whether fast or slow. If your robot
can't do that, then it missed the point.
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
| (...) example (...) I was thinking about this. And I was having a hard time finding a number that would balance out a robot that only moves 1 or 2 blocks then claims to be done. Sure, We never really have people who show up to be goof's on purpose, (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | r10 Project X -- Rules update
|
| After a few days of discussion, this is a set of simple rules to calculate a score for 2 robots going head to head for the upcoming project X games. Way more info here: (URL) like to suggest a 2 minute time limit. Done first +20 Perfect block +10 (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
