Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto22 Ideas?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:57:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
794 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
<snip>
> You don't like assuming most entries will fail to work? I have to agree with
> disliking that assumption. That's why we added the "time" factor. That actually
> caused a couple of us to push the robots a little harder, which made them less
> reliable.
>
> The strategy & logic for playing 3T doesn't come close to C$, but it will still give
> many builders a chance to write more complex software then they ever have.
>
> Steve
I'm liking this idea more and more. I like the time factor to help determine
the winner and I like the time penalty for every 'touch'.
It's just like Project X except one row and column smaller. We could even use
the same blocks and board set-up.
We would also have the same 'bot setup as C$--and the 'hand-off' when a 'bot is
done its move.
So we're combining two of our toughest competitions--X and C$--brilliant!
Let's get it done!
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: rtlToronto22 Ideas?
|
| (...) We didn't do a "time penalty" for touching. That could make it so a very-fast, very-sloppy robot could win against a very-slow, very-accurate robot. If you have to help your robot play, you should lose to someone who doesn't have to help their (...) (18 years ago, 2-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: rtlToronto22 Ideas?
|
| (...) The easiest way is to cover the board with tiles. However, that's a bunch of tiles, and not everyone has that available (after they've made the cubes). On the other hand, leaving the board as-is will give better builders another challenge to (...) (18 years ago, 2-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
