Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto22 Ideas?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:08:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
745 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Guerquin wrote:
> I can bet that even IF everyone had the software logic done perfectly (which
> people won't), not every game would be a tie because of sensing glitches,
> mechanical glitches, and other random events caused by a full moon :)
See that's the problem I have with 3T...it's bankrupt by default. Same with
ProjectY...we're all making the assumption most entries won't work properly, so
don't worry that the outcome is deterministic is a non issue.
It seems to me kind of "incorrect". I can't put my finger on why I don't think
it's right.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: rtlToronto22 Ideas?
|
| (...) OK, I understand Steve. Makes more sense than infinite do-overs or whatever. At first I didn't see the big deal with "non-flat" cubes - but then the light bulb went off, and I realized that if they're not flat, they can't be scanned by the (...) (18 years ago, 2-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
