Subject:
|
Re: Quite C and BrickOS (WAS: Re: Steve H, C$, me learning C Brick OS)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:48:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
477 times
|
| |
|
|
Calum Tsang wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
> > ok, back to what is C
> >
> > so if I take an example helloworld.c file from a demo section of my current
> > nightmare (brickos)
>
> Well, the general syntax and structure of C are the same. But how you call the
> motors, sensors and other hardware is different from platform to platform,
> unless someone deliberately tried to make them all common, which I'm not sure.
>
> Think of it like this. On your C64, programs that said:
>
> 10 PRINT "CHRIS IS THE BEST"
> 20 GOTO 10
>
> worked exactly the same way on the Apple II or another computer, because print
> and goto are generic BASIC tokens for almost all platforms.
>
> But if you had a program that was like:
>
> 10 PRINT "CHRIS IS THE BEST"
> 15 POKE 53280,6
> 20 GOTO 10
>
> where line 15 changes the border colour on the display, this won't port clean to
> the Apple II, because that poke calls specific hardware (the 64's VIC graphics
> chip) in a specific way.
>
> How Quite C and legOS do non generic stuff would be part of the porting
> exercise. I don't think is is nontrivial.
>
> Calum
wow calum, I take back some of those nasty things i said about you to the reporter
at dinner.
your 64 example explained it very well.
thanks.
so based on what calum said, I wont even bother trying to install QC. cause my
marble prg might not work.
Chris
There's no 'I' in 'team'. There's four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
