Subject:
|
Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Nov 1999 18:54:54 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.&NoSpam&com
|
Viewed:
|
1718 times
|
| |
|
|
Lorbaat wrote:
> women
> with small breasts can't be whores
I know for SURE that can't be the case... and please don't ask me why.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
| (...) Exactly. A logical fallacy! You saw my point. Now, about this evidence you have- I think you should share with everyone so we can have a proof for our theory. Please, elucidate us! eric (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
| (...) Whoa, whoa, whoa. Are you trying to say that what Mike's wife said (in the quotes above, for those of you following at home) unfairly implies that women with small breasts can't be whores, or are you trying to say that the statement is (...) (25 years ago, 2-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
89 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
