Subject:
|
Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Nov 1999 07:51:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2466 times
|
| |
| |
Richard Marchetti wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.general, Rose Regner writes:
>
> > I find this whole thread rather amusing. Put a few curves on a minifig and
> > it sends you guys into a boob frenzy.
>
> Hey, if we all actually looked like lego minifigures we would all need to diet
> very badly -- well, maybe not if you looked like the lego skeleton.
>
> But if you are gonna define a castle female mini, she has to be corsetted! To
> omit the wasp-waist would be just as great an act of omission as to forget the
> essentially useless chainmail on a male castle mini. Taking it one step
> further, its my understanding that many court ladies of the same period
> ACTUALLY went about with their breasts completely exposed above the corset.
> The only pictorial representation of this fashion that I can think of is an
> old John Bolton story in "A-1" magazine (a British comic anthology).
Great to see a silly argument turn into an educational thread :-)
Eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Castle returns for 2000!
|
| (...) Hey, if we all actually looked like lego minifigures we would all need to diet very badly -- well, maybe not if you looked like the lego skeleton. But if you are gonna define a castle female mini, she has to be corsetted! To omit the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
89 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|