Subject:
|
Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 May 1999 22:15:12 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
C576653@CCLABSihatespam.MISSOURI.EDU
|
Viewed:
|
396 times
|
| |
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
> > > <snipping of various heretical postulations>
> > > > Wrong? Larry? Couldn't be.
> > >
> > > As the Larritarians all know, the Larry is never wrong.
> >
> > Well, Tom, I'd amend this statement. Larry *was* wrong once... that was the
> > time he *thought* he was wrong;-) [1]
>
> NO!! Say it isn't so! :( But you'll note he (purportedly) erred on the side of
> caution, and that is to be taken under consideration.
>
> So has there been any progress on firmly establishing the Larritarian rules for
> polygamy? :)
What? Sometimes The Larry will declare that you must play with more
than one set at a time? I know this might shock some, but I've always
been up for that. Some sets are really good at interfacing pleasantly
with others for your enjoyment.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
56 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
